Muffled
Jesus in me
A question like this should be asked with specific reference.
Which particular writing of Bahaullah?
So what are yousaying that the B man had both secular and religious writing?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
A question like this should be asked with specific reference.
Which particular writing of Bahaullah?
I wish I could affect an audible sigh on these forums, because it would just be so appropriate right now.
You have been railing on against me, in defense of the OP, within which THE FIRST FEW SENTENCES ARE THESE:
Why are you defending this, asking me to provide evidence for God's non-existence, when I have been saying all along that I simply do not support working from the assumption of God's existence which is EXACTLY what the OP does in its first three sentences?
This is just ridiculous. Why does anyone have to put up with shenanigans like these, I ask you?
God by definition can do anything at all.
It's why it is the ultimate cop-out for any question that would otherwise stump an intellectually honest person.
You can always fall back on "god dun it" - which he can by definition, since god is defined as "the entity that can do anything".
Which renders the entire thing meaningless, btw.
Can he make Jennifer Anniston materialize in my bedroom? I guess he can. Why hasn't he done so?
I bet suddenly the "why hasn't he done so" doesn't count to the same point you were trying to make, because it happens to not support your a priori assumed conclusion and you hold double standards.
So what are yousaying that the B man had both secular and religious writing?
I have two questions.
1. The Quran's I have seen had to have words added in to make sense in certain verses. Why is that if it is considered so eloquent?
2. Why can't sunni's and shia's agree on what it means if it is so clear and eloqent? Who is right when there is disagreement on meaning?
Not even close. I don't have to do anything... except not believe you. That I will do until evidence of an appropriate caliber is brought to the table. I simply can't believe this stuff. Can't. The evidence is not good. You say that "the record" has God speaking? So what?! That's nothing at all. For the longest time "the record" also had Zeus playing a large role in the goings-on of the world. Meaning that "the record" is garbage. Absolute garbage. And here you are, throwing your entire lot in with "the record." Banking on it as if it were going to save your life.I believe there is an appropriate saying: Put up or shut up.
The fact is that the record has God speaking so the record is that God exists. If you are going to say that it was man pretending to be God then you have to show that it is what men would likely say, After all God says His ways are not mans ways.
The Quran and interpretation is a huge thing. I've decided to keep things short. The Devil and his minions never give up on distorting the wishes of a Prophet or Messenger or Leader appointed by God.
They propagate distorted understanding. The Quran is clear, but the problem is along with this distorted understanding, there is a curse from Gog and Magog and the devils, to keep people from perceiving Quran clearly as in the clear book. This is what itself states about itself.
In the past, the first wave of distortion is in what Quran says the Jews did when breaking their covenant, they distorted God's words away from their place. This is the first step. Then over time, when meaning is wrong, they can change words to suit the wrong meaning. But first distortion of holy books is always in taking things outside their place (not letting context of Quran and verses contextualize each other).
Now while in the past, distortions also took in the text severely, the Quran is protected as in text. But this makes Satan and his minions do even more effort to blind the Muslims.
The inward Satanic locks are confirmed by the outside propaganda. There is also apathy of those who can recite Quran properly to spread their knowledge properly. The result is the Quran is mistranslated SEVERELY and MISINTERPRETED EVEN WITH ARABIC NATIVE SPEAKERS.
The Quran is exalted and can guide humans towards the highest realities and keep them grounded at the same time.
The thing is while I say this, through Quran and words of Ahlulbayt (A) and believers who narrate their hadiths, and Ahlulbayt (A) light reality, the dark magic upon it can be defeated.
This witnessing of the Quran and the forces of evil trying to distort it and keep from understanding is one of the main reasons I'm Muslim.
NO I am talking about how words have to be added to what the Quran says to make complete sentences, etc.
How can native Arabic speakers not even be able to accurately translate it if it is so eloquent?
I was answering the Sunni-Shia divide despite Quran. You said why can't they agree upon it if it's so clear and eloquent and so I responded to that.
Why not?
Why would God use the signs of miracles, prophecy and good character to build credibility of His revelation in the Old and New Testament, but then change thereafter leaving people confused?
Given that 10%-20% of humans suffer from different levels of dyslexia, why would God use the eloquence of a text show it comes from Him, when He would know that a section of any population would be excluded from directly being able to evaluate it?
If it’s far beyond human capacity we also wouldn’t be able to read it.God can speak in a way humans cannot. He can put signs in his speech that would indicate it's from him and beyond capability of humans. I think this is rational, as we see there is ranks to eloquence, and not everyone is capable of the same eloquence.
Therefore if God speaks in a way beyond all humans and challenges all humans and Jinn, to bring something like it if they don't believe it's revealed by God, I believe this is a legitimate challenge.
I also believe some of the sermons and prayers and visitations taught by Ahlulbayt (a) are beyond normal humans, but still, I can see Quran is MUCH higher in eloquence, form, and speech.
So people can't even replicate some of the works of Ahlulbayt (a) and bring something similar to it, let alone the Quran which is signs from God in form of speech.
I believe it's legitimate challenge, bring something like it or akin to it. Another challenge it poses which is fair, you claim it's not guidance from God, then bring something more guiding than it.
Both challenges are fair from my perspective.
Is it great enough for a movie franchise or tv series?The ones who claim Quran is false or in serious doubt about it should in my view, Instead of just claiming it's false, let them prove it false. If you don't doubt God and Mohammad (s), no need to.
If it’s far beyond human capacity we also wouldn’t be able to read it.
Anyway, so what do you suggest God uses?
Why not use the means He used before in the Old and New Testament: miracles, prophecy and good character?
Why not use the means He used before in the Old and New Testament: miracles, prophecy and good character?
Why would God use the signs of miracles, prophecy and good character to build credibility of His revelation in the Old and New Testament, but then change thereafter leaving people confused?
Given that 10%-20% of humans suffer from different levels of dyslexia, why would God use the eloquence of a text show it comes from Him, when He would know that a section of any population would be excluded from directly being able to evaluate it?
You bring a good point, the Quran has to give good reasons why miracles and performer of them in good character is not in public view currently because this was a consistent way of God per Quran as well, and this is a huge topic in itself. I believe the book that does that best currently is Quran, and next to it is the Bible including the Gospels.