• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Random, Meaningless Political post thread

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
He will be single and available in a while... :yum::hearteyes::hearteyes:




:hearteyes:

I have heard explosive things about redhead men and sex...
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
Abraham%20Lincoln%20riding%20a%20grizzly%20bear-thumb-600x337-45749.jpg
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
The people own the means of production there.
So yes, it is indeed socialism. Such oppression
is an emergent property of such a command
economy.

The above is incorrect:


Either way, if we can use North Korea as an example to demonize socialism, let's also use Saudi Arabia, Francoist Spain, and Pinochet's Chile as examples of how much authoritarianism capitalism causes.

(I think that would be just as much of an ideologically charged oversimplification as the statement about North Korea, though.)
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The above is incorrect:


Either way, if we can use North Korea as an example to demonize socialism...
So you see only demonization, not legitimate criticism, eh.
Why should I bother responding to you?

I will say that capitalism in N Korea would be progress.
Best wishes for them.
 
Last edited:

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
So you don't recognize legitimate criticism...it's just demonization, eh.

It was an oversimplication based on a factual inaccuracy. I see nothing legitimate about that example, although there's indeed legitimate criticism of socialism.

Why should I bother responding to you?

For the same reason I bother responding to misrepresentations of socialism and what many socialists stand for. It's a two-way street.

But I'll add that capitalism in N Korea would be progress.
Best wishes for them.

That country's problems run far deeper than labels of economic systems, similarly to the problems of Saudi Arabia and Francoist Spain.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
It was an oversimplication based on a factual inaccuracy.
So you say.
We've no common ground for discussion.

Now, back to a random political post...
 
Last edited:

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member

I wonder whether this was done by Russia itself to make the war seem necessary or to further stir up anti-Ukrainian sentiment.

There are some ugly comments on that article where people are wishing for more attacks on civilians, though, which reminded me of why I tend to avoid online comment sections. I suspect that many—possibly even most—people generally view strikes against unarmed civilians as a red line, a point that many have brought up concerning attacks on American, British, and Israeli civilians. I see no reason unarmed Russian civilians, who might not even support the war for all we know, shouldn't be viewed similarly, especially considering that their "votes" wouldn't even change anything within Putin's regime.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I wonder whether this was done by Russia itself to make the war seem necessary or to further stir up anti-Ukrainian sentiment.

There are some ugly comments on that article where people are wishing for more attacks on civilians, though, which reminded me of why I tend to avoid online comment sections. I suspect that many—possibly even most—people generally view strikes against unarmed civilians as a red line, a point that many have brought up concerning attacks on American, British, and Israeli civilians. I see no reason unarmed Russian civilians, who might not even support the war for all we know, shouldn't be viewed similarly, especially considering that their "votes" wouldn't even change anything within Putin's regime.
Could be Russian false flag attack.
Could be anti-Putin Russians.
Could be Ukraine (which appears to have not commented yet).

It wouldn't make sense for Ukraine to provoke Russia
in a manner that wouldn't effect defense of Ukraine.
 

Wu Wei

ursus senum severiorum and ex-Bisy Backson
Could be Russian false flag attack.
Could be anti-Putin Russians.
Could be Ukraine (which appears to have not commented yet).

It wouldn't make sense for Ukraine to provoke Russia
in a manner that wouldn't effect defense of Ukraine.


giphy.gif

main-qimg-00330f6e749cb274f0a8951daed3fab6
 
Top