He will be single and available in a while...
I have heard explosive things about redhead men and sex...
I have heard explosive things about redhead men and sex...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The people own the means of production there.
So yes, it is indeed socialism. Such oppression
is an emergent property of such a command
economy.
And all lexicographers.Your opinion.
And all lexicographers.
Which is an opinion rising to the level of fact.
I needn't be one to use their definitions.You're not a lexicographer.
The people own the means of production there.
So yes, it is indeed socialism. Such oppression
is an emergent property of such a command
economy.
So you see only demonization, not legitimate criticism, eh.The above is incorrect:
Private sector overtakes state as North Korea's top economic actor under Kim -S.Korea
The private sector has overtaken state-led agents to become North Korea's biggest economic actor over the past decade, a sign of booming markets allowed by leader Kim Jong Un, South Korea's Unification Ministry said on Thursday.www.reuters.com
Either way, if we can use North Korea as an example to demonize socialism...
So you don't recognize legitimate criticism...it's just demonization, eh.
Why should I bother responding to you?
But I'll add that capitalism in N Korea would be progress.
Best wishes for them.
So you say.It was an oversimplication based on a factual inaccuracy.
I needn't be one to use their definitions.
Damn straight.You're no Jack Kennedy either.
Still no idea what you are on aboutthe Duce's grandaughter.
MEP
Awesome.
Well...it was a meaningless, random, political post...Still no idea what you are on about
Wealthy Moscow region is hit by kamikaze drones as Kyiv is blitzed
A deluded Vladimir Putin and his cronies today accused Ukraine of trying to 'frighten' Russians with their 'increasingly reckless behaviour' after Moscow was targeted in a drone attack blamed on Kyiv.www.dailymail.co.uk
Could be Russian false flag attack.I wonder whether this was done by Russia itself to make the war seem necessary or to further stir up anti-Ukrainian sentiment.
There are some ugly comments on that article where people are wishing for more attacks on civilians, though, which reminded me of why I tend to avoid online comment sections. I suspect that many—possibly even most—people generally view strikes against unarmed civilians as a red line, a point that many have brought up concerning attacks on American, British, and Israeli civilians. I see no reason unarmed Russian civilians, who might not even support the war for all we know, shouldn't be viewed similarly, especially considering that their "votes" wouldn't even change anything within Putin's regime.
Could be Russian false flag attack.
Could be anti-Putin Russians.
Could be Ukraine (which appears to have not commented yet).
It wouldn't make sense for Ukraine to provoke Russia
in a manner that wouldn't effect defense of Ukraine.