Hypocrites then?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The reasons of abortions: why women have abortions
- Thread starter Estro Felino
- Start date
Hypocrites then?
Eh? Could you please answer the question instead of you usual trick of mocking it?
Secret Chief
Very strong language
Secret Chief
Very strong language
Obviously. But you know these hot latin lovers, why let your devout faith get in the way of a ****?
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Here in the States, a poll of Catholics I saw maybe about 10 years ago said that something like 95% of Catholics don't agree with the Church's teaching on birth control. Does that make them "hypocrites"? Not really as the Church does its job to teach what it believes is right, but Joe & Mary Parishioner have the right to make up their own mind, especially if it doesn't affect others negatively.
Pre-marital chastity is some Pauline theology.
Let's not forget that Jesus forgave the adulteress.
Have you searched for statistics on it?
What would you do with the info?
I did. I provided with a pie chart in the OP. American institute of statistics.
I don't know. Do you?
McBell
Unbound
Are you talking about the one that covers a whopping 8 of the Fifty states?
No. post #1
McBell
Unbound
If you are not even going to read your own sources, how can you be taken seriously?
The correct answer to my question is yes.
.
It clearly, flat out states "....from the eight states...." plain as day right below the pie chart...
The lawsuits were started by anti-abortion activists.
In November a lawsuit was filed by the Christian legal group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), arguing that the FDA exceeded its regulatory authority and ignored safety concerns when it approved mifepristone – a drug that blocks progesterone, a hormone needed for a pregnancy to develop – more than two decades ago. The FDA vigorously rejected those arguments, pointing to repeated and rigorous reviews of the highly regulated drug.
A Trump-appointed federal judge in Texas, Matthew Kacsmaryk, sided with the plaintiffs, issuing a preliminary injunction on 7 April suspending the FDA’s 23-year-old approval of mifepristone. He also endorsed the plaintiffs’ views that a previously dormant, 150-year-old anti-vice law called the Comstock Act “plainly forecloses mail-order abortion”.
The ADF is thought to have chosen to file the lawsuit in Amarillo, Texas, specifically so it would appear before Kacsmaryk, who is known for his anti-abortion views, and employed anti-abortion rhetoric throughout his decision, referring to mifepristone as a drug used to “kill the unborn human”.
www.theguardian.com
A Trump-appointed federal judge in Texas, Matthew Kacsmaryk, sided with the plaintiffs, issuing a preliminary injunction on 7 April suspending the FDA’s 23-year-old approval of mifepristone. He also endorsed the plaintiffs’ views that a previously dormant, 150-year-old anti-vice law called the Comstock Act “plainly forecloses mail-order abortion”.
The ADF is thought to have chosen to file the lawsuit in Amarillo, Texas, specifically so it would appear before Kacsmaryk, who is known for his anti-abortion views, and employed anti-abortion rhetoric throughout his decision, referring to mifepristone as a drug used to “kill the unborn human”.
Abortion pill case: where does the lawsuit against the pill currently stand?
The fifth circuit court of appeals is considering the future of mifepristone after the supreme court blocked new restrictions
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Why?
It's an honest question.
Why do YOU care if some woman gets an abortion or not?
How is it different for you if that woman never got pregnant in the first place by use of a contraceptive?
How does this difference impact you?
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
And nobody profits from selling those hormonal pills?
Couldn't you make the exact same argument there?
The abortion pill costs as much as 800 dollars.
A box of 28 hormonal pills costs less than 17 euros.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
You have to constantly re-buy hormonal pills whereas abortion pill is a one time use.
The business model behind hormonal pills is a model based on recurring income.
As an enterpreneur, if I had to pick which one I'll base my business on, I'll take the one with recurring income any day of the week.
With hormonal pills, you kill nobody.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Moving the goalposts, I see.