One might imagine that.I'd imagine because nobody else was as negligent and careless with their emails.
But only if one already had a solid bias against either the USA, the Democrats, or both.
Tom
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
One might imagine that.I'd imagine because nobody else was as negligent and careless with their emails.
One might imagine that.
But only if one already had a solid bias against either the USA, the Democrats, or both.
Tom
Are you a cyber expert on the case?Russia doesn't have to be viewed as an enemy all because of the name of Hillary.
Confidence doesn't equate to physical evidence.
They didn't get this stuff from Hillary. A hacker wanted dnc stuff and got it, not by negligence but because hackers get passed security protocols. They even knew pretty immediately of a breach.Everyone else's stuff was more protected by not being negligent.
I'd imagine if Wikileaks released stuff on Trump it would be believed, but since it's Hillary Wikileaks can't be believed. I can only imagine how much then Wikileaks would be trusted if it started bombarding the Republican's and Trump.
When people are negligent, it opens this door. Rather than taking responsibility they blame Russia.
Are you a cyber expert on the case?
They didn't get this stuff from Hillary. A hacker wanted dnc stuff and got it, not by negligence but because hackers get passed security protocols. They even knew pretty immediately of a breach.
Do you know why someone might be confident without physical evidence. It's not a religion they are trying to promote. Do you know why Intelligence would have been advising the candidates of Russia's involvement of hacking DNC since June. You think cyber experts use some sort of crystal ball?Confidence doesn't equate to physical evidence, whether someone is a cyber expert or not.
One thing leads to another.
Do you know why someone might be confident without physical evidence. It's not a religion they are trying to promote. Do you know why Intelligence would have been advising the candidates of Russia's involvement of hacking DNC since June. You think cyber experts use some sort of crystal ball?
I only am reporting what is said to the public. What I believe is besides the issue, your the one just prepared to call them liars without knowing what or why. It isn't always very difficult to find where a cyber attack is coming from, sometimes its a little more difficult but not impossible, and sometimes takes cyber security experts to figure out. You would be surprised what Russia is doing even in private sectors, not that it means the Russian government is involved, thats another issue all together.I don't know. Agenda, cover-ups, assumptions, the need to blame somebody, or that it's true, partly true. Who knows. You seem to trust everything the government will mentally feed you, which is your choice.
I do not, as they were confident in Iraq's WMD's in order for .......... something.
I only am reporting what is said to the public. What I believe is besides the issue, your the one just prepared to call them liars without knowing what or why. It isn't always very difficult to find where a cyber attack is coming from, sometimes its a little more difficult but not impossible, and sometimes takes cyber security experts to figure out. You would be surprised what Russia is doing even in private sectors, not that it means the Russian government is involved, thats another issue all together.
I haven't ruled that out either.Also, for all we know a third party can be trying to cause enmity and conflict between the US and Russia, or the US government itself can be trying to focus the attention on Russia and the public. Who knows.