Except it isn't. In other words, if you read the Bible, without a notion as to whether Jesus is God , or isn't God, you would notice that the 'Lord', is Jesus, sometimes in the Old Testament, [what sometimes means here is an obvious correlation, so forth.
In other words, 'Jesus is God', [[ie called God, because Jesus is the Lord, just from reading the texts.
That is why you can easily argue that Jesus is either 'direct modalism', in other words there isn't any distinction, or, you can argue that although Jesus is same God, like Elohim, though 'God' singular plural, which is actually how I always argue, or, you can argue trinitarianism that still has Jesus as God, or, you can argue a different g-d.
In other words, unless you realize that, you don't have an argument.
Because when you argue that Jesus is just a rabbi, you get all sorts of Scriptural problems.
In other words, you need to figure out your argument here, instead of saying that what we're reading, is incorrect.
These are Scriptural debates, because that's how we always argue; in my personal beliefs, I would not present the 'same argument', though Jesus would be
The Lord with us, Adonai, and then we are back to the problem with your argument because we pray to Adonai, obviously.
You aren't going tell me a 'religious argument', that is obviously wrong to Biblical text, that I actually use.
