Some of the posts in this thread
Hindu View on Other Religions | Page 3 | ReligiousForums.com
remind me of one of my objections to the idea that religion should define itself as a manifestation of the desire of some deity.
While I understand that those who believe in deities will naturally want to follow whatever paths they see as being in harmony with the will of those deities, the fact remains that their understandings can and do vary quite a lot when it comes to what those deities want from them.
That is particularly problematic for the monotheisms - which in practice include Hinduism as well. By relying on the idea that God is one and the same for all believers, they are in effect leaving divergent understandings alone without challenge or questioning. While that is usually proper and safe, there are situations when firm challenges to destructive religious stances are needed.
The way I see it, religious practice should allow and accommodate for (but never demand) belief in deities according to the inclinations of the practicioner. But it should never rely on the idea that God (or, less seriously, a specific deity) will ensure some sort of ultimate proper understanding of religious values. Facts are way too clear in showing that monotheistic practice does not lead to a common ground of values and understanding to any meaningful degree.
For better or worse, it is human responsibility to care for the general values of our religious practice. A supernatural God may or may not exist, but he most certainly isn't guiding his believers towards a proper religious understanding. Maybe he does not exist as such; maybe he wants his believers to be capable of making their own judgements about what is proper.
Opinions?
Hindu View on Other Religions | Page 3 | ReligiousForums.com
remind me of one of my objections to the idea that religion should define itself as a manifestation of the desire of some deity.
While I understand that those who believe in deities will naturally want to follow whatever paths they see as being in harmony with the will of those deities, the fact remains that their understandings can and do vary quite a lot when it comes to what those deities want from them.
That is particularly problematic for the monotheisms - which in practice include Hinduism as well. By relying on the idea that God is one and the same for all believers, they are in effect leaving divergent understandings alone without challenge or questioning. While that is usually proper and safe, there are situations when firm challenges to destructive religious stances are needed.
The way I see it, religious practice should allow and accommodate for (but never demand) belief in deities according to the inclinations of the practicioner. But it should never rely on the idea that God (or, less seriously, a specific deity) will ensure some sort of ultimate proper understanding of religious values. Facts are way too clear in showing that monotheistic practice does not lead to a common ground of values and understanding to any meaningful degree.
For better or worse, it is human responsibility to care for the general values of our religious practice. A supernatural God may or may not exist, but he most certainly isn't guiding his believers towards a proper religious understanding. Maybe he does not exist as such; maybe he wants his believers to be capable of making their own judgements about what is proper.
Opinions?