Can you explain how can a person give a interpretation, when its already been interpreted
The worst interpreter is the one that thinks he's not interpreting.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Can you explain how can a person give a interpretation, when its already been interpreted
There are two ways in reading the Bible.
You have in the Bible, words in black and white, and red and white.
Now what ever one reads is in black and white or red and white.Ok
Now the Spirit of the word is not seen by the eyes.
It takes the spirit of God to understand those things that are spiritual
This is why Christ Jesus said in many places, "He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says"
Many people have their ears stop up, that they can't hear what the Spirit of the word is saying.
This is why it's Written in
1 Corinthians 2 14--"but the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness unto him, neither can he know them, because they are Spiritually discerned"
This is why people can not see the Celestial man and the Terrestrial man.
Because it's foolishness unto him.
Because they are spiritually discerned by the Spirit of God.
if it isn't in the first, it is a matter of interpretation. And, often, even when it *is* in the first.
Now can we get back to evolution? We have established that Christians can and do believe in evolution and that they interpret the Bible in a way that is different than they way you do.
So you are saying that Christianity is about the fourth most popular religion in the world? What religion are the countless Christians that do not make your errors when it comes to interpreting the Bible?Nope, you establish about christians, I did not establish Christians believing in evolution.No Christian who is a true Christian, would contradict the bible.
I see what your trying to do and it will not work, your trying to say I agreed to something which I never did. That's called falsifying , when you say I agreed to something which I never did, do you know that RF here is against such things.
In your interpretation.Nope, you establish about christians, I did not establish Christians believing in evolution.No Christian who is a true Christian, would contradict the bible.
I see what your trying to do and it will not work, your trying to say I agreed to something which I never did. That's called falsifying , when you say I agreed to something which I never did, do you know that RF here is against such things.
There are two ways in reading the Bible.
You have in the Bible, words in black and white, and red and white.
Now what ever one reads is in black and white or red and white.Ok
Now the Spirit of the word is not seen by the eyes.
It takes the spirit of God to understand those things that are spiritual
This is why Christ Jesus said in many places, "He that has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says"
Many people have their ears stop up, that they can't hear what the Spirit of the word is saying.
This is why it's Written in
1 Corinthians 2 14--"but the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness unto him, neither can he know them, because they are Spiritually discerned"
This is why people can not see the Celestial man and the Terrestrial man.
Because it's foolishness unto him.
Because they are spiritually discerned by the Spirit of God.
In your interpretation.
No, I am pointing out that there are many Christians that disagree with your interpretation.
My, my, it is an ingenious scam. I'm not buying it.
if it isn't in the first, it is a matter of interpretation. And, often, even when it *is* in the first.
Now can we get back to evolution? We have established that Christians can and do believe in evolution and that they interpret the Bible in a way that is different than they way you do.
That's where your wrong, There are many and alot of Christians who do believe in evolution as I am one of them.
So you can not concluded every Christian as believing in your nonsense of evolution.
Oh by the way isn't the Thread about
"The science of Human evolution ?
I am speaking about (human) man of flesh and blood was here on earth.
But did not come from no apes as (evolution) claims.
I never claims *all* Christians believe in evolution. I said that many scientists are Christian and *also* acknowledge the truth of evolution.
No modern human was around 500,000 years ago or before. The humans that developed later are ancestors of the apes that existed then. If you think otherwise, please supply the evidence in support of your position. Citing the Bible doesn't
count. We want physical evidence that all can observe and agree concerning its properties.
I never claims *all* Christians believe in evolution. I said that many scientists are Christian and *also* acknowledge the truth of evolution.
No modern human was around 500,000 years ago or before. The humans that developed later are ancestors of the apes that existed then. If you think otherwise, please supply the evidence in support of your position. Citing the Bible doesn't count. We want physical evidence that all can observe and agree concerning its properties.
If they are real in any sense of the word, then their existence should be demonstrable.No what you don't realize is that those stories as you call them, may not be be real to you, but to others they maybe real.
And when science talks about the dinosaurs as living Million to Billions of years ago, and the bible supports that claim.
And that man was there also.
If they are real in any sense of the word, then their existence should be demonstrable.
Go ahead and demonstrate their existence.
Sure I'm gifted with infallible bible knowledge , just like people are gifted with infallible of not knowing.
You got to be kidding Are you saying you never heard about the dinosaurs, you can on the internet or to any Museum of dinosaurs bones, that should tell you the dinosaurs as being real.
"infallible of not knowing" is nonsense, so, what is your statement supposed to mean?
Try not dodging and qualifying.
Are you claiming to be infallible, when it comes to bible reading?
More dodging. Even a idiot would know he was not talking about dinosaurs.
There are people who just read the Bible, and still get nothing out of the Bible.
Then there are those, who reads the bible, then adds their own words in the Bible.
Then there are those, who not only reads the bible, But also understands what the Spirit of the word in the Bible is saying.
Yeah, I can say that, all because I not only read what is in black and white and red and white in the Bible, but I also understand what the Spirit of the word in the Bible is also saying.
Where as people are lost.but because they don't understand Spiritual things that are in the Bible.
Now do you understand what it means to have Spiritual understanding?
I can talk about Spiritual things, but then you and others, would not even come close what the heck what I'm talking about.
That it would go right over your head.
Slow down, relax. I'm referring to your claims about terrestrial and celestial men, and your claim that the latter existed alongside dinosaurs. Please demonstrate the existence of the celestial men you speak of.You got to be kidding Are you saying you never heard about the dinosaurs, you can on the internet or to any Museum of dinosaurs bones, that should tell you the dinosaurs as being real.
Ah yes, always we hear this claim that by being a "Christian" you become privy to arcane knoweldge
denied to the rest of us.
Of course, sometimes I dont know what you are saying because your English is so scrambled.
Now, hows about you quit trying to change the subject and just say, yes or no-are you infallible when it comes to correct bible-reading?