yeah ignore the persons who post the liesI must admit I am tired of talking with him. Perhaps it best if we just ignore him.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
yeah ignore the persons who post the liesI must admit I am tired of talking with him. Perhaps it best if we just ignore him.
The Holy Bible is in the original languages.
The Koran is not.
brother,please don't wast your time to reply for foolish post , I know that the truth shockYou are kidding me right? You actually believe that Jesus (as) spoke Greek? That Adam (as) spoke Hebrew?
brother,please don't wast your time to reply for foolish post , I know that the truth shock
I have not seen you present anything that even remotely looks like science.I hate repeat , you just reread the posts , to know , if you don't like it don't post , and if you like it don't post
You are kidding me right? You actually believe that Jesus (as) spoke Greek? That Adam (as) spoke Hebrew?
you miss this , there is a Bible in arabic language lolThe Holy Bible is in the original languages.
The Koran is not.
Arabic oldest the english , and it's semtic language , and Jesus (pbuh) called his god as We calledCorrect.
They certainly never spoke Arabic.
thanks brother, i appreciate your help .Alright. Sorry. Oh and Salaam Alykum
you miss this , there is a Bible in arabic language lol
exactly as the Quran lol
Told the arabic Christians this,Any Arabic Bible is post-Koranic, and is a translation of the original.
accuatly Muhammad mention in the bible by nameThe problem with calling Muhammad a prophet is that he never made a prophesy.
Told the arabic Christians this,
the english Bible is not the original Bible
accuatly Muhammad mention in the bible by name
you just repeating your lies here , i discussing this before"Muhammad" isn't even mentioned in the Koran by name.
The term "Muhammad" was never a name when the Koran was written...it was a participle, brother.
You really need to start studying Arabic.
you just repeating your lies here , i discussing this before
I told you that you are post the lies hereActually, you have not.
Nope...according to your Koran.
Go ahead, show me one verse from your Koran in which it states that someone named "Muhammad" had anything at all to do with the material...
Good luck...
I am sure that you misunderstand the Islam , and you have no idea about it , because your claim ,it's very wrong claim ,
look at the sura 47, it's called "Muhammad" .
I told you that you are post the lies here
look at this thread page 11:
and this is: was my reply
did you discover that you just post the lies here ? did you check the page 11 of this thread ?Islam is not even under discussion, brother.
However, you can start by properly defining the term "Muhammad"...