The secret behind carisma

[Spirit of Light]

I can only repeat the part of my thread. Man, please read the thread!

3. Who is to blame? No one. It is simply an inevitable and necessary law of statistics. However, there is always a chance, and it increases with time: "knock and it will be opened to you" (Jesus Christ). Persistence and confidence are important in any business.

Maybe you have to go on too then, and not grind the question about the scientists who reject your paper, time to forgive them

 

[questfortruth]

Maybe you have to go on too then, and not grind the question about the scientists who reject your paper, time to forgive them

I am blaming nobody, including my papers. I have discovered the Theory of Loser. Or the Theory of Carisma. It is a breakthrough in Statistics, which in Heaven would get Nobel Prize. By the way, would there be something else besides sex and food in Heaven?

 

[questfortruth]

Maybe you have to go on too then, and not grind the question about the scientists who reject your paper, time to forgive them

 

[Kooky]

What is the actual point of these threads? You don't seem to have any particular desire for exchanging ideas or debating your positions in the proper fashion, and you've yet to convert anybody on this forum to your faith by argueing as far as I can tell.

So why do these threads exist?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I am blaming nobody, including my papers. I have discovered the Theory of Loser. Or the Theory of Carisma. It is a breakthrough in Statistics, which in Heaven would get Nobel Prize. By the way, would there be something else besides sex and food in Heaven?

I don't know why you would need either in Heaven as it has been described to me.

 

[questfortruth]

What is the actual point of these threads? You don't seem to have any particular desire for exchanging ideas or debating your positions in the proper fashion, and you've yet to convert anybody on this forum to your faith by argueing as far as I can tell.

So why do these threads exist?

It is an ordinary thread. If it feels special, then I am special. But I am a good man.
I try to stay away from any sin. I really enjoy discussions on this forum about my ideas.
I am a top scientist. please read my papers in Physical Rev. E, Eur. Phys. J. B.
Please do not report the thread to authorities. I would not mind if you report, but I do not like it if you do.

 

[blü 2]

Your post is an example of such behavior. But not because I am bad at something, but because I am a loser. I have lost 100 times. Your post is 101-st time. And it had a chance of 0.01.

Golly.

When things like that happen to me, I wonder if I'm missing something ...

 

[questfortruth]

Golly.

When things like that happen to me, I wonder if I'm missing something ...

I did it, so I rechecked the papers. Yet, no mistakes or flaws found.

 

[GardenLady]

Who is to blame? No one. It is simply an inevitable and necessary law of statistics.

Sorry, I must disagree. If you are submitting to scientific journals and your papers are continually rejected, then there is a significant scientific issue that you are choosing to avoid or reject. It is not a merely law of statistics. It has to do with understanding, accepting, and adhering to the standards of a field of scientific inquiry, and your persistence in choosing not to do that.

 

[blü 2]

I did it, so I rechecked the papers. Yet, no mistakes or flaws found.

And no feedback to guide you?

 

[questfortruth]

Sorry, I must disagree. If you are submitting to scientific journals and your papers are continually rejected, then there is a significant scientific issue

And no feedback to guide you?

No feedback. Heard of injustice?

 

[Mock Turtle]

No feedback. Heard of injustice?

They probably figured you would work it out for yourself, being so smart and all.

 

[questfortruth]

They probably figured you would work it out for yourself, being so smart and all.

Please read the thread. Must I quote again the part of the thread?

"3. Who is to blame? No one. It simply the law of statistics...."

 

[blü 2]

No feedback. Heard of injustice?

Well, another thing I'd consider if such things were happening to me is the line Shakespeare gives Cassius: "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but ..."

And I'd take informed advice.

 

[GardenLady]

"3. Who is to blame? No one. It simply the law of statistics...."

Please explain how you think this is simply the law of statistics. Some journal submissions are accepted for publication and some are not. I have had papers accepted for conferences and journals and have had papers rejected. it's the nature of the work. Do you think that is a random distribution?

My own experience is that the reviewers assess the scientific merit and clarity of the paper. Does the author demonstrate knowledge of the extant body of related research? Does the author provide a clear theoretical basis for the paper? Is a research hypothesis clearly stated? Is the methodology documented? Are the conclusions supported by the research?

If there is no feedback, then it appears that the reviewers' assessment of the criteria above is that the paper is so far off the mark that feedback is unlikely to be useful (or accepted). IIRC, you did receive some feedback on at least one paper using the phrase "word salad"?

 

[viole]

The following article is about losers in general. There is such a word. Here is an article about them. It shows why any loser became a loser. It has been shown that even an absolute genius and the kindest person can become a loser. Everyone has a dream. Any loser fails to achieve a dream.

1. You are on the level of Albert Einstein in mind-power, and Mother Teresa in kindness.
2. But you were unjustly refused/rejected 100 times.
3. Therefore, you have become a genius loser.
4. And if so, then for the 101-st time you will almost certainly be refused, no matter how kind and holy the refuser is. If you fail the first 100 attempts to please the public, then your 101-st chance to reach someone else's heart is estimated as one hit out of a hundred misses. This number does not depend on the character of the refuser, on his/her sense of justice, on his/her soul. But if you're not perfect, then the chances are even lower. Below one percent.

Notes:
1. This applies to everything: publications in scientific journals, looking for a job, finding a friend and a good relationship with others, as well as prayers to the saints and God.

2. It seems to a loser that all girls are the same, even if each one has her own opinion and a unique soul. And it seems to the lucky one that all the girls are easily accessible. But most of the girls are not shameless sinners: they are easy and playfully minded, only because he is lucky.

3. Who is to blame? No one. It is simply an inevitable and necessary law of statistics. However, there is always a chance, and it increases with time: "knock and it will be opened to you" (Jesus Christ). Persistence and confidence are important in any business.

FROM DISCUSSION:

Opponent: "you must actually learn something from the failures. Otherwise, the direction of your business, regardless of confidence and persistence, will inevitably be at the bottom of the ocean."
Nobody can correct a mistake before the mistake is found.

Opponent: "Does it mean that every scientist you have sent your papers to who rejected you must be wrong because you can not do wrong? or that the mistakes or lack of correctness in your papers are not wrong according to you?"
I can only repeat the part of my thread. Man, please read the thread!
"Who is to blame? No one. It is simply an inevitable and necessary law of statistics."

How can you have the brain of Einstein while doing the same thing over and over (trying to publish) while expecting every time a different result?

ciao

- viole

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

Nobody can correct a mistake before the mistake is found.

Then you should get to work to find your mistakes. Or ask for outside help.