I was obligated to sit and watch it last summer. The entire movie could be understood in the first 10 to 20 minutes. Even though my friend wanted me to continue to sit through it, near the very end, I finally got up and walked out.
The basic gist was sadly overwhelmed with get-rich-quick thinking, whereby miracles happen simply by believing they will. Not that those things are not possible...And not to discount the power of positive thinking or the law of attraction (both of which are real phenomena)...But the movie concentrated on money, money, money. Some of the miraculous tales of wealth in the movie were downright incredible, as in not very believable.
The movie made me mad. However, my friends thought that I was being "negative" and I was not really "giving it a chance." Well...here is my rebuttal...
It is an excerpt from
Kurt Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse-Five" where he quotes Howard W. Campbell, Jr.:
"Americans, like human beings everywhere, believe many things that are obviously untrue, the monograph went on. Their most destructive untruth is that it is very easy for any American to make money. They will not acknowledge how in fact hard money is to come by, and, therefore, those who have no money blame and blame and blame themselves. This inward blame has been a treasure for the rich and powerful, who have had to do less for their poor, publicly and privately, than any other ruling class since, say, Napoleonic times."
Furthermore, on the topic of "miracles", here are a few words from
Thomas Paine's "The Age of Reason":
Excerpts from Chapter XVII--Of the Means Employed in all Time, and Almost Universally, to Deceive the Peoples.:
Mystery is the antagonist of truth. It is a fog of human invention that obscures truth, and represents it in distortion. Truth never invelops itself in mystery; and the mystery in which it is at any time enveloped, is the work of its antagonist, and never of itself.
...If we are to suppose a miracle to be something so entirely out of the course of what is called nature, that she must go out of that course to accomplish it, and we see an account given of such a miracle by the person who said he saw it, it raises a question in the mind very easily decided, which is,--Is it more probable that nature should go out of her course, or that a man should tell a lie? We have never seen, in our time, nature go out of her course; but we have good reason to believe that millions of lies have been told in the same time; it is, therefore, at least millions to one, that the reporter of a miracle tells a lie.