Skwim
Veteran Member
SOMEONE SHOULD
FOR EVEN BOTHERING
  I DESERVE IT
FOR EVEN BOTHERING
  I DESERVE IT
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Seven Days of Creation, Scripturally
- Thread starter Aman777
- Start date
A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
Carrots and peas. Carrots and peas.
s2a
Heretic and part-time (skinny) Santa impersonator
I don't mean (entirely) to get off on the wrong foot here, only asking?
Which translation of Scripture is the ONLY version for all of humanity to accept as the ONLY literal interpretation of the inerrant "God's word"?
This is NOT a trick question. I only request specificity.
After you share that revelation of truth, might we then continue.
All I ask is, "Be specific".
NIV? ASV? RSV? NASB? NSRB?
Shall we continue? There are over two dozen "English" "translations" alone...
SO?
What do you rely upon and look to as THE "translation" that all unbelievers should read to best understand Christ as Savior?
Who cares what "science" says...what do YOU say?
Hmmm?
Which translation of Scripture is the ONLY version for all of humanity to accept as the ONLY literal interpretation of the inerrant "God's word"?
This is NOT a trick question. I only request specificity.
After you share that revelation of truth, might we then continue.
All I ask is, "Be specific".
NIV? ASV? RSV? NASB? NSRB?
Shall we continue? There are over two dozen "English" "translations" alone...
SO?
What do you rely upon and look to as THE "translation" that all unbelievers should read to best understand Christ as Savior?
Who cares what "science" says...what do YOU say?
Hmmm?
SOMEONE SHOULD
FOR EVEN BOTHERING
  I DESERVE IT
Dear Readers, Picture me standing on the Seashore waving a fond farewell to just one more Evol who has found it impossible to refute God's Truth. Below is the straw that broke the Camel's back and sent him flying off into the unknown reaches of the Darkness of Cyber Space.
>>>>>>>So bring out your I.Q. tests from thousands of years BEFORE writing and show us How and When this Magic happened. I know you cannot since Science cannot define the difference between animal and Human intelligence TODAY, so I don't believe you have ANY evidence to offer of How or When this event happened thousands of years ago. Admit that today's Science is "willingly ignorant" of the Truth as ll Peter 3:3-7 clearly shows. <<<<<<<<<
When you hit them with the Truth and challenge them to actually produce Empirical Evidence, instead of Name Calling and Implications that you're Nuts, they run away because they can't handle the Truth that Judgment is near. God Bless you, Skwim. I suspect that you were brain washed as a child in the Public Schools of the U.S.. Forgive them, for they didn't know the damage they were doing.
In Love,
Aman
Dear Readers, I fear for the sanity of some Evols. God bless them all.
In Love,
Aman
Dear s2a, I use the KJV, King James Version, of Scripture since the original meanings of the words used can be easily found online. This allows ANYone to actually STUDY God's Holy Word, instead of just reading it. I use Blue Letter Bible - Home Page and BibleGateway.com: A searchable online Bible in over 100 versions and 50 languages. Blue letter Bible also allows you to access the orignal Hebrew and Greek Meanings of the words used in Strong's Concordance of the Bible.
Another reason I use the KJV is that it is the most widely distributed Book in the History of Humankind. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Shad
Veteran Member
Humans are capable of abstract thought while animals are not. This is proven by religion itself which are abstract concepts used to explain abstract questions we have like "why are we here?
Also I see is ignorance of science rather than ignorant science.
Dear Shad, Here are the verses which show the willing ignorance of today's scientists:
ll Peter3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: (Greek-destroyed totally)
7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
Today's scientists ARE willingly ignorant that Adam's world was totally destroyed in the Flood and that the heavens and earth, which are now, will be burned. I know because I've been telling them for more than 18 years online, and most of them are STILL "willingly ignorant" and think that they know more than God. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Shad
Veteran Member
That is not ignorance, it factual science which contradicts the Bible. You want it to be ignoance since it proves your view of the Bible incorrect. You are also take the priori stance that the Bible is in fact the word of God. However since the word of God is contradicted by evidence based science either God is in error or the assumed priori is in fact false. This is due to lazy thinking on your part when taking the priori stance, not that of those that disagree and refute your lazy method of thinking.
A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
Be afraid. Be VERY afraid.
A
angellous_evangellous
Guest
Dear Shad, Science and history AGREE with Scripture, but the Scoffers/Evols of the last days are "willingly ignorant" that Adam's world was totally destroyed in the Flood and that the heavens and earth WHICH ARE NOW will be burned. IF no one tells the Evols the Truth, they remain ignorant, but IF someone tells them and they REFUSE to believe God's Truth, then they are WILLINGLY IGNORANT. Right? Right. I've been telling them for more than 1 1/2 decades online. Are you willingly ignorant of God's Truth? ll Peter 3:3-7 God bless you.
In Love,
Aman
Shad
Veteran Member
No science does not. Archaeology has dismissed Exodus and has developed the Canaanite origin theory. Biology has dismissed Adam and Eve. Geology and Archaeology has dismissed a global flood. Anthropology has developed theories of assimilation of the concept of Heave and Hell as designation of souls from Zoroastrianism. This is evident as Judaism's concept of the afterlife changes from a per-Babylonian captivity of all the Chosen People go to heaven regardless of sins to one of Heaven and Hell. Sins only dictate the time spent in Sheol but none are condemed to Hell for eternity. This is a post-Babylonian construct as these changes to the afterlife happen directly after exposure to Zoroastrianism but not before.
Last edited:
Dear Shad, Really? I'm so glad to hear it. Why don't you tell us How and When Humans evolved from the common ancestor of Apes? In doing so, you can show yourself to be much smarter than God, since He tells us He made Adam, the first Human, from the dust of the ground. Gen 2:4-7 The world awaits your insight. God Bless you, and welcome to the board.
In Love,
Aman
Shad
Veteran Member
Take a class in biology. I am not required to teach grade 11 biology to someone. If you want to learn about it do it on your own time with your own money. Show a little ambition and self-motivation.
I am not saying I am smarter than God. I am saying the Bible is not from God since it makes factual mistakes. I am pointing out these mistakes. I can claim to have more knowledge of the world than the scribes which wrote the text which I believe is accurate. Once you drop the idea that the whole text is from God you could perhaps build a new idea of your religion and drop the ideology you currently hold. There are a number of people which has accepted theistic evolution or abiogenesis. They are not opposing scientific knowledge but are adapting it into their belief systems. Once literial verses are now seen a metaphors. You can do the same, it is up to you.
Last edited:
s2a
Heretic and part-time (skinny) Santa impersonator
And may you too not cross the street in mid-day blindfolded either
In love...
At any rate, your answer is the KJV.
Thanks. Noted.
Bless you too.
Dear Shad, I can prove that you are mistaken from Genesis, since God tells us Scientifically True Facts, which NO man of the time could have possibly known. A good example was just recently discovered. Science has learned that it was several Hundreds of Millions of years AFTER the Big Bang BEFORE the first Stars formed and put forth their light into our Cosmos.
Genesis 2:4 shows that the Big Bang of our Cosmos was on the THIRD Day, the SAME Day Adam's Earth was made, Gen 1:9-10 which was some 13.7 Billion years ago, in man's time. Genesis 1:16 shows that the FIRST Stars did NOT light until the FOURTH Day. Was it God Who authored this, or was it ancient, uneducated, superstitious, goatherders, who lived thousands of years before Science, who authored this? IF you answer is still goatherders, then please explain Who told them?
Failure to explain will reveal that you don't know HOW the goatherders knew what to write. It's PROOF of God. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
s2a
Heretic and part-time (skinny) Santa impersonator
It's all in the KJV.
Unbelievers, read your Bible!
ONLY the King James Version mind you!
Any and all other translations (regardless of language, translation, subsequent revisions, etc.), are flawed, lies, or likely testaments of Beelzebub...
to wit: Changes to the KJV since 1611: An Illustration
Remember, Aman TOLD you so...
Originally Posted by Reptillian
Funny, I just cracked open my handy Bible and I've read the entire book of Genesis forwards and backwards...I don't see any mention of Jesus anywhere. What version of the Bible are you using?
Dear Reptillian, Since Jesus IS the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end, look for Jesus from Genesis to Revelation...and you will find Him. Jesus is the Light of the First Day, in fact, since the Sun was NOT made until the 4th Day Gen 1:16, Jesus provided the Light of Adam's world, where trees grew with His Light. You can also find Jesus at the end of Revelation where He provides the Light of New Jerusalem, Rev 21:23 which is 1500 miles square, which is half the size of the United States, in the 3rd Heaven.
Remember, also that without Jesus was NOT anything made which was made, John 1:3 and that includes the heaven (air) and ground without form (dust) and water which were made in the beginning, BEFORE Jesus came into the physical world. Remember that Jesus is also the Son, of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, Trinity, Who SPOKE matter into the physical world. Heb 11:3 It sounds to me like a way to change the Energy in His world into the matter of our's. I've anxious to know.
BTW, Those who have not been born Spiritually won't understand until they are born again, by believing the Gospel of Jesus Christ, according to the Scriptures. 1Co 15:3-4 God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
So Jesus is God?
According to Romans 1:3-4, Jesus was designated the son of God at his resurrection. Why would God declare himself to be the son of God at his own resurrection?
Phillippians 2:6-11 "Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name which is above..." Why would God exalt himself and bestow on himself a name which is above every other name if he was already God?
Acts 3:26 & 4:27,30 - Jesus is labeled "Holy Servant of God".
Acts 3:22 "A Prophet like Moses."
Acts 2:22 "A man attested by God with deeds of power, wonders & signs."
1 Corinthians 11:3, Paul gives this hierarchy. 1) God 2) Jesus 3) Man 4) Woman. Why would Paul put Jesus in second place if he believed Jesus was God?
Even the gospel of John equivocates:
John 14:28 - The Father is greater than I."
John 10:34-36 - John insinuates Jesus is below God.
John 5:19 & 7:16 - Messages conveyed by Jesus originates in God. It implies Jesus conveyed God's messages so how could Jesus be God if Jesus is conveying God's message?