You know, it was interesting to watch him go through a few phases - he started with a confidence couched in utter ignorance of ToE and complete faith in the ID sources as "scientific", I THOUGHT I saw him wobble after a couple dozen pages of hardcore evidence, then he retreated to his "flock" to reaffirm his ridiculous beliefs and came back, balls-out, his confidence now couched in the intention to "destroy" this and "destroy" that entire field of science.
IMO, the reason for this language is that he is "destroying" his own recollection of the evidence and arguments presented in order to protect his faith, and eradicating the entire experience of discussing ToE with relatively informed people from his memory. (Or, more likely, rewriting it with him as the victor rather than a humiliated, ignorant fool).
You can spot the most effective weapons against YEC by keeping track of the points and evidence he COMPLETELY ignored: the stuff that was so threatening to his beliefs that his "destruction" of the experience of reading it was instantaneous. Like, for example, your point that if there are now 5000 + observed species of lizards, and all of them "adapted" from a single pair of "lizards" 4000 years ago, YEC predicts we must see one generation of lizards unable to breed with its parents generation more than once a year.
It's a simple, effective point with an inherent logic even a simpleton like MoF can not deny. Stick with it.
