OmarKhayyam
Well-Known Member
Really?
So all these fossils and all this evidence and all this DNA tracing is really about - a philosophy?
Ya gonna havfa splain dat.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The ToE and common ancestry of all life forms did not come from looking at the evidence
- Thread starter Man of Faith
- Start date
Really?
So all these fossils and all this evidence and all this DNA tracing is really about - a philosophy?
Ya gonna havfa splain dat.
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
Indeed - evolutionary theory is compatible with, and a natural result of, a rationalist worldview.
Man of Faith
Well-Known Member
Really?
So all these fossils and all this evidence and all this DNA tracing is really about - a philosophy?
Ya gonna havfa splain dat.
All these fossils?
tumbleweed41
Resident Liberal Hippie
MoF,
Do you, or do you not have evidence of Creationism or Intelligent Design?
Do you, or do you not have evidence of Creationism or Intelligent Design?
Man of Faith
Well-Known Member
Use my lieing sources? ROFL, that's a switch. I will give it a shot, because I am a gamer.
Alceste
Vagabond
You know, there are so many fossils lying about that I can go out into the badlands on any given day and come home with a bone fragment, or a piece of fossilized tree, or a tendon, or a clam shell. I've got a 100 million year old carnivorous dinosaur tooth I found hanging around my neck this very moment. Were you under the impression there is a lack of fossil evidence supporting evolution? You were wrong.
OmarKhayyam
Well-Known Member
ragordon168
Active Member
mentioning dinosaurs got me thinking. if noah took 1 of every 'kind' of animal on the ark then which dinosaur did he take? and if everything is <6000 years old then how come dino's were never mentioned in any bible stories, throwing someone to the raptors would be more fun than lions.
Alceste
Vagabond
Another interesting question is whether he bothered to take chickens if he already had dinosaurs aboard. That would be kind of redundant, seeing as chickens were going to evolve from dinosaurs anyway...
ragordon168
Active Member
oh no remember there's the dinosaur 'kind' (is that the reptile kind? or had crocs already nabbed that space?) and the chicken 'kind' (again isnt that the bird kind?) and you cant change 'kinds' so they would both have to be brought.
only problem being if you brought raptors then the chickens (and most of the other animals on board) would have been dinner very quickly. Did noah not see jurassic park?
Alceste
Vagabond
He must have done - in addition to a mating pair of every organism (including those that reproduce asexually) he would have had to bring a mating pair of every video ever made. Otherwise they would all have been destroyed in the flood.
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
"What evidence? There is no evidence for the Theory of Evolution. I don't see any evidence."
Man of Faith
Well-Known Member
<= Man of Faith
"What evidence? There is no evidence for the Theory of Evolution. I don't see any evidence."
Wait a minute, aren't you the one who said that you have heard all you need to hear from creationists.
McBell
Unbound
It would be different if creationists would come up with something new.
But no, they still cling to their already shown false ancient stories, techniques, and strategies.
The only thing new from creationists is what they call it.
Well, maybe if creationists actually provided evidence for their case, I'd listen. But you haven't presented anything new.
Autodidact
Intentionally Blank
No, I said that I know more of what they have to say than you, that I've read, watched and listened to everything they have to say on the subject, and look forward eagerly to refuting your newbie attempt to surprise me.
Now do you have any interest in evidence, or do you want to give up your right to say anything about evidence and ToE anywhere on the internet forever?
LittleNipper
Well-Known Member
<= Man of Faith
"What evidence? There is no evidence for the Theory of Evolution. I don't see any evidence."
Variation within kinds doesn't prove transending capabilities which would produce other stable kinds...
OmarKhayyam
Well-Known Member
Transcending what?
You imply that there is some kind of limit or borderline that cannot be crossed. What is this line that cannot be crossed. Define it. Then we can evaluate whether or not it can be transcended. But if the line cannot be defined then your statement is meaningless.