We don't know that they didn't.nutshell said:If they were capable of it, why didn't they do so before they ate the fruit?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We don't know that they didn't.nutshell said:If they were capable of it, why didn't they do so before they ate the fruit?
Willamena said:We don't know that they didn't.
gnostic said:If Adam and Eve were immortal prior to eating the fruit, then reproducing would not be obstacle. They just didn't do so before they ate the fruit. Not doing so yet and not capable of mating are two different things, and nothing indicate they couldn't do so.
I got that.nutshell said:My post was responding to this post:
I was just agreeing with gnostic's point that we don't know one way or the other. Regardless of our personal beliefs, it's not written anywhere; it's not a part of the mythology that they had sex before the apple bit happened.nutshell said:And I believe they did not. Obviously, Willamena, our interpretations differ.
Victor said:Is there something in fruit that I don't know about?
Sorry nutshell, I'm not following how the fruit has anything to do with them reproducing. Please explain...
gnostic said:There is nothing to indicate they can't reproduce, except through your interpretation. And I don't think being mortals had anything to do with it. You forget that angels could reproduce with mortal women (Genesis 6) to produce giants or the Nephilim, and these angels were immortal.
You don't have to worry about that with me. I usually make a point to search for doctrine in every faith. Considering our respective churches run similar and all. It brings no fruitfulness into discussions to argue about things we are both open to argue about.nutshell said:DISCLAIMER: I'm not sure this post will adhere to LDS doctrine. It is my interpretation and Katz or others are free to comment and/or correct me.
That's interesting. I really wouldn't have a problem agreeing with this.nutshell said:There was no reproducing for two reasons and it has little to nothing to do with the actual fruit on the tree:
1. They were physically unable to have sex.
Adam and Eve had what I like to think of as transitional bodies. The bodies were not designed to grow old and die, but they also weren't mature bodies capable of sexual reproduction. After they ate the fruit, the physical world changed. Part of that change was Adam and Eve's bodies becoming mortal. They would grow old and die. Another change was that they would now be able to have sex and reproduce.
Ok, but how is number 2 specifically connected to the tree? I'm more then willing to accept that they were like children in many ways, but I do not think that the tree is what was needed to triger growth. I think they would have grown even without the tree. See what I mean?nutshell said:2. They were unable to have sex for psychological reasons.
I don't know if "psychological" is the right word to use here, but I'm going to use it so hang with me. Adam and Eve, pre-fruiting, were in a state of innocence. They were like children. They had limited knowledge of right/wrong, good/evil, pleasure/pain, etc. I believe their knowledge of sex was limited as well. This may be connected with their physical state. After all, if, at this point, they are unable to have sexual relations physically, it may well be possible that sexual urges and thoughts aren't even crossing their minds.
Yes. Are you saying that Adam's and Eve's decision to partake of the forbidden fruit was just an unseen glitch that God hadn't stopped to consider? He didn't have to put the Tree there in the first place. Why do you think He did it? And why, if He expected them to be able to withstand the temptation, do you think He had designated His Son to be their Redeemer before the event ever took place?Victor said:Let's try again. Katz said:
God knew what He was doing and He did it for man's benefit
Are you saying that God put a temptation (the tree) for our benefit?
I'll throw in my two cents worth of speculation on this later today. Right now, I've got to go back to work.gnostic said:I think they could already multiply before they ate the fruit, as indicated by Genesis 1:28, on the 6th day of Creation. The temptation of Adam and Eve seemed to happen after the 7th day. Whether another day pass or a year, we can't say.
There is nothing to indicate they can't reproduce, except through your interpretation. And I don't think being mortals had anything to do with it. You forget that angels could reproduce with mortal women (Genesis 6) to produce giants or the Nephilim, and these angels were immortal.
If Adam and Eve were immortal prior to eating the fruit, then reproducing would not be obstacle. They just didn't do so before they ate the fruit. Not doing so yet and not capable of mating are two different things, and nothing indicate they couldn't do so.
Katzpur said:Yes. Are you saying that Adam's and Eve's decision to partake of the forbidden fruit was just an unseen glitch that God hadn't stopped to consider? He didn't have to put the Tree there in the first place. Why do you think He did it? And why, if He expected them to be able to withstand the temptation, do you think He had designated His Son to be their Redeemer before the event ever took place?
Victor said:I asked first...
I think the tree was placed to truly fulfill "free will". I do not believe he placed it for "our benefit". What benefit does it bring exactly?
nutshell said:lol
DISCLAIMER: I'm not sure this post will adhere to LDS doctrine. It is my interpretation and Katz or others are free to comment and/or correct me.
There was no reproducing for two reasons and it has little to nothing to do with the actual fruit on the tree:
1. They were physically unable to have sex.
Adam and Eve had what I like to think of as transitional bodies. The bodies were not designed to grow old and die, but they also weren't mature bodies capable of sexual reproduction. After they ate the fruit, the physical world changed. Part of that change was Adam and Eve's bodies becoming mortal. They would grow old and die. Another change was that they would now be able to have sex and reproduce.
2. They were unable to have sex for psychological reasons.
I don't know if "psychological" is the right word to use here, but I'm going to use it so hang with me. Adam and Eve, pre-fruiting, were in a state of innocence. They were like children. They had limited knowledge of right/wrong, good/evil, pleasure/pain, etc. I believe their knowledge of sex was limited as well. This may be connected with their physical state. After all, if, at this point, they are unable to have sexual relations physically, it may well be possible that sexual urges and thoughts aren't even crossing their minds.
spacemonkey said:Freedom from the Demiurge's entrapment through enlightenment.
sandy whitelinger said:God would not command something that cannot be achieved.
sandy whitelinger said:You just made that up didn't you?
That has no foundation in scripture. God made Adam and Eve and then commanded them to be fruitful and multipy. God would not command something that cannot be achieved.
Victor said:Come again?
spacemonkey said:Except for the fact that fruit is the reproductive organs of a plant. Also it is not uncommon to hear offspring refered to as fruit, i.e. "fruit of my loins".
spacemonkey said:You keep assuming that the being who created this world is the Supreme Being, but what if he's not? What if this world was made by an angry, jealous being who sought to create a place he could control and rule over. What if the serpent were the hero, the Logos of the True God, a God of love and forgiveness preached about by Jesus (another manifistation of the Logos). Just because someone lumped all of the writings that make up todays Bible togeather doesn't mean they are refering to the same Deity. The "god" of the OT is mentioned in the NT, when he offers Jesus all of the splendors of the kingdoms of this world, the one he rules.
spacemonkey said:Actually Adam and Eve were not told to "be fruitfull and multiply" prior to the "Fall of Man" as described in Genesis. The verse after the creation of Eve reads (at least in the NIV) "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh. The man and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame." (just a bit of a draft) After that, Genesis goes right into the story of the tree and serpent. Not a single mention of reproduction. It is intreasting to note that in that chapter (#3) verse 22 states, "And the Lord God said, 'The man has now become like one of US, knowing good and evil.' " Who else is he refering to?
spacemonkey said:It is intreasting to note that in that chapter (#3) verse 22 states, "And the Lord God said, 'The man has now become like one of US, knowing good and evil.' " Who else is he refering to?