sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
No, I said that humanity creates its own understandings of Deity.then we agree, man makes and defines his own deitys.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, I said that humanity creates its own understandings of Deity.then we agree, man makes and defines his own deitys.
Oh? How?you just contradicted yourself.
What were the points you were debating with others?you dont seem to understand "you" and your viewpoint is a rarity and its not the same points I was debating with others
No, I said that humanity creates its own understandings of Deity.
No, I said that humanity creates its own understandings of Deity.
There's a difference between creating Deity and creating certain understandings of Deity -- unless you're accusing me of idolatry, which is futile, since I don't believe God is a particularity.
There's a difference between creating Deity and creating certain understandings of Deity --
Outhouse:
Just because you don't buy into the theological authority of the church doesn't negate that authority and, thus, does nothing for your argument. As an atheist, I should think that it's your opinion that carries no weight -- not that of the church. Your opinion is OK, but it certainly carries less weight than the church that developed the understanding (which you don't get) in the first place. That would be like me telling the Hindus that reincarnation is "full of bull." It's their religion -- their understanding.
It's just never been Catholic doctrine that dogma comes to us:
a. unmediated by human hands or minds
b. from scripture alone.
I'd like to know at what point anyone decided that the Bishop of Rome was the official Successor of the Apostleship,
I'm saying an atheist trying to prove that Scripture does not contain the Trinitarian doctrine is a waste of time for both the Catholic and the atheist (and certain catholic derivatives). We don't prove it with Scripture. It is, in any case, a matter of the assent of faith to a truth divinely revealed. We believe that the Holy Spirit guides the Church, even in its historical circumstances, in making solemn definitions of doctrine, as it did in the fourth century.
I still have no idea how that applies to the argument in this thread.
I'm talking about small "c" catholic traditions, like Anglicanism.
It applies to the crux of Outhouse's argument that the Trinity is not found in Scripture. At which point Sojourner accused him of holding to sola scriptura, where he then responded that he thinks all religious doctrines are man made anyway.