• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Truth Behind Trump

suncowiam

Well-Known Member
I am not making any claim that there is imminent danger. IF you read what I said "Is it just remotely possible that President Trump received a security briefing that indicated that the countries affected by this EO had a high security risk?" Do you see any claim that we are in imminent danger?

The best way to fix this is for President Trump issue a new executive order that does the same thing but carves out exception for those that currently have green cards or visas. That can not be challenged in court. Well it could, but has no legal standing.

There are many things remotely possible, like Russians influencing the election and we have a president that was elected under falsehood.

Are we done now with remotely possible assumptions?

Maybe I just don't know the US system well enough, but I believe Trump has other ways to escalate defense if he truly has Intel on potential attacks. He at least has to understand that without proper evidence, a court of the law cannot act on presumptions. You and I understand that, right?

[Edited] Concerning your suggestion on the visa, well, Trump needs to work things out a bit further now...
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
I am not making any claim that there is imminent danger. IF you read what I said "Is it just remotely possible that President Trump received a security briefing that indicated that the countries affected by this EO had a high security risk?" Do you see any claim that we are in imminent danger?

The best way to fix this is for President Trump issue a new executive order that does the same thing but carves out exception for those that currently have green cards or visas. That can not be challenged in court. Well it could, but has no legal standing.[/QUOTE]
I find it hard to believe trump just happened on special intelligence that nobody else knows regarding six specific countries being an eminent danger. Are we at war or something?
 

Jeremiahcp

Well-Known Jerk
Question there @idav. How can these judges make a determination on security issues, are they privy to the intelligence that the President is? The purpose of this EO was to take a look at who we let into this country and what measure are taken to determine if they are sufficient. Is it just remotely possible that President Trump received a security briefing that indicated that the countries affected by this EO had a high security risk? No, you and everyone else that had a issue with this EO is basing your objections on social reasons only.

Where were all you when the Obama cancelled the Cuban refugee policy. Oh that's right it was the Obama and in all of your eyes he could do no wrong. Sheeesh

In other words. . . .

sheple-think1.jpg
 
Top