Audie
Veteran Member
USA is not that good at honouring its treatiesThere's still the matter of Taiwan of which the US is obligated via the Taiwan Act.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
USA is not that good at honouring its treatiesThere's still the matter of Taiwan of which the US is obligated via the Taiwan Act.
Evidence?Sanctions are an act of war and have never achieved what they are claimed to achieve.
Tell that to Putin.If only we could all engage in trading instead of wars.
Big questions beyond the scope of this thread.Why is the US viewing China as a threat? Why does the US view any country as a threat?
Not odd to me.It seems odd that the US has so many enemies.
Baseless?Why the baseless accusations about China invading Taiwan? China has not had a problem with the One China policy so what gives?.
What do sanctions accomplish? How have sanctions helped the people of N Korea?Evidence+
Tell that to Putin.
Big questions beyond the scope of this thread.
Not odd to me.
It results from bad leadership.
Baseless?
Oh dear...I almost succumbed to the
temptation to make a Kool-Aid jab.
Instead of offering the asked forWhat do sanctions accomplish? How have sanctions helped the people of N Korea?
What is the evidence that China is threatening to attack Taiwan? I have heard the notion parroted a million times but what is the actual evidence for this accusation?
Do you believe US navy ships in the China Seas is a defensive measure or an act of provocation and aggression?
If sanctions have accomplished something positive, I am asking you what that would be? I don't have any evidence for sanctions accomplishing anything positive? Do you? I can provide negatives, starving masses, leaders gaining a more powerful grip while the population becomes more dependant on their leader, that sort of thing. Maybe that is the goal, to starve the masses, to allow dictators to gain the upper hand.Instead of offering the asked for
evidence, you only ask it of me, eh?
This isn't worth continuing.
I've nothing to add/If sanctions have accomplished something positive, I am asking you what that would be? I don't have any evidence for sanctions accomplishing anything positive? Do you? I can provide negatives, starving masses, leaders gaining a more powerful grip while the population becomes more dependant on their leader, that sort of thing. Maybe that is the goal, to starve the masses, to allow dictators to gain the upper hand.
It's an act passed by congress. Violation of an act is illegal far as I know.USA is not that good at honouring its treaties
KANSAS CITY NATIONAL SECURITY CAMPUS, Mo. (AP) — In an ultra-sterile room at a secure factory in Kansas City, U.S. government technicians refurbish the nation’s nuclear warheads. The job is exacting: Each warhead has thousands of springs, gears and copper contacts that must work in conjunction to set off a nuclear explosion.
Eight hundred miles (about 1,300 kilometers) away in New Mexico, workers in a steel-walled vault have an equally delicate task. Wearing radiation monitors, safety goggles and seven layers of gloves, they practice shaping new warhead plutonium cores — by hand.
And at nuclear weapons bases across the country, troops as young as 17 keep 50-year-old warheads working until replacements are ready. A hairline scratch on a warhead’s polished black cone could send the bomb off course.
Those workers are about to get a lot busier. The U.S. will spend more than $750 billion over the next 10 years replacing almost every component of its nuclear defenses, including new stealth bombers, submarines and ground-based intercontinental ballistic missiles in the country’s most ambitious nuclear weapons effort since the Manhattan Project.
It’s been almost eight decades since a nuclear weapon has been fired in war. But military leaders warn that such peace may not last. They say the U.S. has entered an uneasy era of global threats that includes a nuclear weapons buildup by China and Russia’s repeat threats to use a nuclear bomb in Ukraine. They say that America’s aged weapons need to be replaced to ensure they work.
“What we want to do is preserve our way of life without fighting major wars,” said Marvin Adams, director of weapons programs for the Department of Energy. “Nothing in our toolbox really works to deter aggressors unless we have that foundation of the nuclear deterrent.”
It doesn't work quite that way. All systemsSo, our current nuclear arsenal has gotten too old and needs to be replaced.