• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The war mongering legacy of the Biden administration.

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Putin should nuke Joe Biden

Escalating us into WWIII

What is he thinking ... clearly not
Well, of course it's not Biden
Biden is just their puppet
Puppet he is, indeed

Maybe Biden "thinks" this stunt will make him look strong ... in reality he is a "Master fool"
Putin should nuke Biden?
Biden is the puppet of some conspiratorial cabal?

Oh, dear.
Calm down.
 
Last edited:

Nimos

Well-Known Member
Like I said I have no qualms about Ukrainians attacking the interior of Russia, or even North Korea for that matter, but just not with our our equipment for which the agreement was to be used specifically to protect their own borders. Not beyond them.
Russia has no issues using Iran drones and NK soldiers or anything.

Besides that Ukraine already has gotten permission to use EU weapons to attack military targets in Russia. The US has been way too weak in this regard in my opinion, so it's good that Biden allows it.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
I'm all for the defense of Ukraine mind you as my posts in the past have reflected that, but using long-range missiles to go into the interior of Russia is, I would say , a different animal.

Wouldn't that kind of depend what the targets are?
I mean, Russia launches rockets and drones into Ukraine from Russian territory all the time. What if Ukraine uses these long range weapons to target those launch sites?

In Flanders we have a saying: "dweilen met kraan open" which translates literally into "mopping with the tap open".
It's like cleaning up de leaves of the trees in your garden when fall starts. Your garden is completely clean, but the next day it will be full of leaves again. It continues until there's no more leaves on the tree or until you simply remove the tree.

As it stands, Ukraine is faces with barrages of missiles and drones all the time and there only, and very costly, defense is shooting them out of the sky.
What if they can attack the launch sites and simply prevent Russia from even launching them, or at least make it harder to do so?

113.4 billion is what the Biden Administration has given to the logistics support for the Ukrainian War so far. Just let that massive number sink in for a while.

Sure, a lot of money. But in the great scheme of things, it's not THAT much.
For example, Trump spend more then a billion dollars on just his campaign in 2020.

I can't imagine what additional cost those long range missiles will incur on American taxpayers even more than it already has.

Not as much as a bunch of Patriot missiles to try and prevent from the barrage of missiles coming from Russia to demolish Ukrainian infrastructure.

Democrats can now shut up their mouths about the right being warmongering profiteers themselves. They are just as bad if not worse.

Ukraine has been begging from day 1 for the US and others to allow them to do this.
It's not exactly fair to call the US "warmongering" for finally allowing it.

You make it sound as if the US is pushing these weapons upon Ukraine and telling them to attack Russia with it, instead of Ukraine begging for it...
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
Like I said I have no qualms about Ukrainians attacking the interior of Russia, or even North Korea for that matter, but just not with our our equipment for which the agreement was to be used specifically to protect their own borders. Not beyond them.

If Ukrainians can procure more logistics from other countries that will allow them attack the interior Russia or North Korea, then I would say more power to them. The only way I would be on board with interior offensive based strikes into Russia or North Korea would be if North Korea or Russia started to kill our own troops.

This so far is a Russian/ Ukrainian war and it should stay that way. Democrat snakes just want to sabotage the incoming Trump Administration, and this is one of their ways they're going to go about it by recklessly escalating things to the point that this may very well become something much larger, and so they can blame the upcoming Trump Administration for it.
Sounds like speculation which also doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
 

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
"Russian President Vladimir Putin has previously said the U.S.'s approval of such missile strikes would constitute an act of war. He has yet to react to Biden's announcement Sunday"
...

"Putin has previously said that giving Ukraine the green light on missile use would effectively mean that the U.S. and NATO are "in the war."


Yeah yeah

He also said that about freezing Russian assets.
And about sending ammo.
And about sending tanks.
And about sending F16s.
And about sending missiles and patriot systems.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Maybe in 30 years, after the current Kremlin authoritarians have left the building.
No...immediately.
Salvini's party has already said something about it.

Do you know Salvini?
He's more famous than any Belgian politician out there, so you surely do. :)
Before that, I wouldn't bank on it. See what I did there? :tearsofjoy:
Dream on.

I have deep respect for Belgians. Our last queen was Belgian.

But the EU establishment makes me puke. :)
 
Last edited:

TagliatelliMonster

Veteran Member
No...immediately.
Salvini's party has already said something about it.

Do you know Salvini?
He's more famous than any Belgian politician out there, so you surely do. :)

Dream on.

I have deep respect for Belgians. Our last queen was Belgian.

But the EU establishment makes me puke. :)
You're the one who's dreaming.
 
Top