Thief
Rogue Theologian
you were born with a slate untouchedSpeak for yourself.
but now you seem to be......'touched'
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
you were born with a slate untouchedSpeak for yourself.
I'm done. This is my last post on these forums. I'll let the atheists that run the place lick their wounds and gnash their teeth, I've got better things to do. As Eric Cartman would say, "Screw you guys, I'm going home."
Given the number of assertions you've had handed back to you on a silver platter, I am not surprised.I'm done. This is my last post on these forums. I'll let the atheists that run the place lick their wounds and gnash their teeth, I've got better things to do. As Eric Cartman would say, "Screw you guys, I'm going home."
Just a quick aside.
The trouble with science and religion is assumption.
If a man from primitive earth is walking along the beach and comes across a watch it's assumed that man would think the watch had a designer. Not necessarily. It's quite possible the man would think "What a pretty rock, I think it would look cool if I rubbed some **** in my beard and stuck it there."
It's also possible that the man would think "That's not a bad watch. Not as good as the ones on my home planet Rolex V but, not bad at all. . . "
There's no reason why we can't have a sense of humor.
Just a quick aside.
The trouble with science and religion is assumption.
If a man from primitive earth is walking along the beach and comes across a watch it's assumed that man would think the watch had a designer. Not necessarily. It's quite possible the man would think "What a pretty rock, I think it would look cool if I rubbed some **** in my beard and stuck it there."
It's also possible that the man would think "That's not a bad watch. Not as good as the ones on my home planet Rolex V but, not bad at all. . . "
There's no reason why we can't have a sense of humor.
Yes, we must all be cautious about presumption, presupposition and assumptions. But ask yourself, are problems of infinite regression and conservation of matter and energy, when speaking of the universe, presumptuous?
And what does the man think of a stone that he sees on the same beach? Isn't your position that God made the stone also? Therefore isn't the stone just as grand an object? Why all this focus on a watch?Just a quick aside.
The trouble with science and religion is assumption.
If a man from primitive earth is walking along the beach and comes across a watch it's assumed that man would think the watch had a designer. Not necessarily. It's quite possible the man would think "What a pretty rock, I think it would look cool if I rubbed some **** in my beard and stuck it there."
It's also possible that the man would think "That's not a bad watch. Not as good as the ones on my home planet Rolex V but, not bad at all. . . "
There's no reason why we can't have a sense of humor.
don't go yet.....
think revenge
Oh really? I'll get me a copy of it when you've completed the Watchtower's 1971 tome, Aid In Understanding the Bible.
I'm done. This is my last post on these forums. I'll let the atheists that run the place lick their wounds and gnash their teeth, I've got better things to do. As Eric Cartman would say, "Screw you guys, I'm going home."
I demonstrated the hypocrisy in that already, what's the point in repeating it?
I can teach you the Bible. Ask me anything. I invited anyone here on a religious forum, which is not unlike like every other religious forum I've been to in that they consist primarily of disgruntled atheists proselytizing science and collectively you couldn't abide me asking just one question regarding Amphipithecus . . . no it was Aegyptopithecus . . . You, again collectively, could only tell me to read and accept the links they pulled in a quick search, and then have the nerve to complain at MY lack of interest?
The hypocrisy, arrogance and ignorance astounds me.
You knock science with lies yet object, comolasin and run when you are challenged on a public forum. The mind boggles at the patronising hypocrisy, arrogance, condescension and ignorance. It truly astounds me.
"the atheists who run this place", specifically."let the atheists lick their wounds"!
Any atheists participating in the thread feel "wounded?" Show of hands?I'll let the atheists that run the place lick their wounds... I've got better things to do. As Eric Cartman would say, "Screw you guys, I'm going home."
Thing is, in a crazy sense he won.
He got what he came for.
It is a thing that certain people do-
so that they can go back to creo-land
and report that they argued a whole
roomfull of atheists to a standstill,
In the process they suffer-oh how they do
suffer- the insults, ad homs, the dishonest,
the expected but still shocking vicious, illogical,
uneducated bigotry, and all that is inevitably
hurled by those of low degree at the prophets.
But, they leave us, proudly erect, unfazed.
Leave us, licking our wounds!
Meanwhile, we've supplied them with stories
to tell back in creoland.
Maybe we should get a little smarter about
don't feed the troll - Google Search:
Just a quick aside.
The trouble with science and religion is assumption.
I think it is more a problem with storytelling. Folks create a plausible story and tend to believe it's true without any possible verification.
Even science people create stories based on what evidence is available which may or may not match the reality. These remain theoretical until either proven or disproven. People should understand these theories can be wrong.
Religions also create stories which may seem perfectly plausible to the believer. However with religion there is generally not a requirement for verification. What is asked by religion is faith and conviction. Requirements that science criticizes. If/when faith and conviction supersedes verification in religion or science then the truth is not what one seeks. They end up seeking another plausible story to support their conviction.
Faith and conviction should be avoided if one seeks the truth.
Given the number of assertions you've had handed back to you on a silver platter, I am not surprised.
This happens a lot when religionists venture out onto level playing fields like RF.
Tom
I'm done. This is my last post on these forums. I'll let the atheists that run the place lick their wounds and gnash their teeth, I've got better things to do. As Eric Cartman would say, "Screw you guys, I'm going home."