Continued:
Aaaaah. So it's a bit like Christians telling me that there's a god, i just need to open my eyes to see it. It sounds a bit like special pleading.
And it sounds exactly like the same argument you've repeated several times so far, without changing it one bit. It's still: "Would you pwwwweeeeeeaaase believe my claims without evidence? THEN you will see."
Special pleading.
I think you've made so many errors that it'd be fair to not hang up on perceived errors of others. Maybe the root of the problem is that people are understanding what you're saying. But you aren't understanding what others are saying to you.
Like i said, i made no such claims. You don't understand what i tell you.
I don't have to if you don't have to explain the mechanisms for your claims. But if you insist:
"The same way they create everything else; physics and chemistry."
Wow.
Sounds a lot like any other religious person proselytizing to be honest. That's what they all say. "Once you open your eyes, you will realize that it's not a matter of belief." That's the claim.
Special pleading - Wikipedia
This is the claim. Now demonstrate it. Otherwise you are guilty of special pleading and appealing to emotion.
I know. It's a classic example of special pleading.
You don't know how i see the world in terms of anything. You don't get to claim that i have baggage. Unless your only aim is to do as much special pleading in one post as humanly possible.
Well, i'll put your fears to rest: You broke the record.
You seem to be fixated on making claims of me and other people based on what you read here. But this is a debate forum, and in a formal debate the position of the arguers should NOT matter one bit. Only the strength of the argument.
I have been in formal arguments. I've even argued for things i don't agree with.
And i'm not shooting down your arguments because of what you believe, but because of the weakness of your argument. YOU are shooting down our arguments based on what WE believe.
Or more accurately, what you think we believe.
I'm a Buddhist. But i'm not arguing from a Buddhist point of view. I feel your constant claims of me being conditioned and blind and having baggage, actually lower the value of your points.
"Judgmental little fool" is probably not something you were looking for when it comes to peoples' perceptions of you. But that's how i see you.
No, thank YOU.
When you awaken from a dream, you know it to be a dream just by the very act of awakening. The mystical experience is an awakening of a much higher nature.
Aaaaah. So it's a bit like Christians telling me that there's a god, i just need to open my eyes to see it. It sounds a bit like special pleading.
And it sounds exactly like the same argument you've repeated several times so far, without changing it one bit. It's still: "Would you pwwwweeeeeeaaase believe my claims without evidence? THEN you will see."
You can always leave your fixation on those delusional dancing cave wall shadows called Reason, Logic, and Analysis, and go outside the cave to see the Sun for yourself.
Special pleading.
Fine, but you make the error of claiming that the self is necessary to the mystical experience. Why do you think that?
I think you've made so many errors that it'd be fair to not hang up on perceived errors of others. Maybe the root of the problem is that people are understanding what you're saying. But you aren't understanding what others are saying to you.
Like i said, i made no such claims. You don't understand what i tell you.
But YOU don't understand it. If you do, tell me how molecules and electrical energy create consciousness.
I don't have to if you don't have to explain the mechanisms for your claims. But if you insist:
"The same way they create everything else; physics and chemistry."
You seem not to get the difference. Proselytizing involves belief in a doctrine that cannot be demonstrated to be true. I am telling you that you can demonstrate the authenticity of the mystical experience by experiencing it directly yourself. Belief is not a part of the experience.
Wow.
Sounds a lot like any other religious person proselytizing to be honest. That's what they all say. "Once you open your eyes, you will realize that it's not a matter of belief." That's the claim.
Special pleading - Wikipedia
I don't know any more than you do in terms of the mystical experience, because it is not an experience involving knowledge. It is the experience of realizing your oneness with the Universe. Yes, you can intellectually understand your being at one with the Universe, but experiencing it is not the same thing.
This is the claim. Now demonstrate it. Otherwise you are guilty of special pleading and appealing to emotion.
I am suggesting that you don't see the mystical experience as valid simply because your mental conditioning prevents you from doing so.
I know. It's a classic example of special pleading.
It's baggage that you only see the world in terms of Reason, Logic, and Analysis, which serve to reinforce that very baggage as being the correct view.
You don't know how i see the world in terms of anything. You don't get to claim that i have baggage. Unless your only aim is to do as much special pleading in one post as humanly possible.
Well, i'll put your fears to rest: You broke the record.
They are judge, jury and hangman. Basically your vision is distorted and in need of correction, but you don't know it, so accustomed to the distortion you have become.
You seem to be fixated on making claims of me and other people based on what you read here. But this is a debate forum, and in a formal debate the position of the arguers should NOT matter one bit. Only the strength of the argument.
I have been in formal arguments. I've even argued for things i don't agree with.
And i'm not shooting down your arguments because of what you believe, but because of the weakness of your argument. YOU are shooting down our arguments based on what WE believe.
Or more accurately, what you think we believe.
I'm a Buddhist. But i'm not arguing from a Buddhist point of view. I feel your constant claims of me being conditioned and blind and having baggage, actually lower the value of your points.
"Judgmental little fool" is probably not something you were looking for when it comes to peoples' perceptions of you. But that's how i see you.
More later....
cheers
No, thank YOU.
Last edited: