I would think this idea should just be what we go by for the purposes of this DIR since it's the most objectively stated and generalized one I've seen so far in all of these topics. It's also essentially the same statement I've seen others make in the past when discussing definitions in other places online. All this posturing, on both sides, is getting really old. I don't care who believes what about the term anymore, we all gotta share this DIR.
I tend to agree, mostly what is going on here is an exercise of tautological obfuscation in the vein of stroking individual hubris. It is worthless to fight over the meaning of the words, but rather we should take the contributions of many and see them as parts of the same pizza. The pizza isn't trashed if we make it half and half, or even put different toppings in each corner. We can challenge each others ideas, but we don't have to do it in ways that ultimately undermine the path as a whole. We don't have to think the LHP has to be a homogeneous one topping pizza to be valid, and it probably is better if it isn't. If we are truly walking the wiser path then we need to stop nipping the heels of those that walk before us and behind us. We need the merit of our ideas to speak for themselves without the childish shenanigans akin to high school bullying. We need to forgive, and to some extent encourage, the variation of ideas that others have about the subject in order to do what ultimately is good for all of us -- take the best and leave the rest.