Tiberius
Well-Known Member
Theological belief, including the belief that gods do not exist. That, too, is a belief based on the proposition of the existence of gods.
Are you actually claiming that holding any belief about the existence or non-existence of God counts as religion? There is a biog difference between an belief about religion and a belief that is religion.
That's like saying that any writing about fairy tales is itself a fairy tale.
The ideology that humans possess the capacity to determine the existence of gods, if they were to exist, and that humans could prove that determination to others.
By this logic, any belief at all is dogmatic.
Leading to the position that if the existence of gods has not been proven the the atheist, to the atheist's satisfaction, that the only reasonable assumption to adopt is that gods do not exist.
This reasoning is very weak, of course, and most atheists know it, even though they continue to hold to it, which is why they are so reluctant to claim it, publicly, and instead try to deflect and subvert the conversation with statements about what they DON'T believe, and what they DON'T assert, rather than what they do believe.
Except I've yet to find any atheist who says, "Since the evidence you have provided for the existence of God doesn't satisfy me, YOU are forbidden from believing!"
Of course, if an atheist finds the evidence for God unconvincing, they aren't going to believe - it's a perfectly reasonable conclusion. You would not believe in anything if you found the evidence for it to be unconvincing.
But you seem to be pretending that atheists are going around demanding that believers stop believing as well: "I'm not convinced, so you aren't allowed to believe either!" That's a blatant strawman argument. The people who I have seen trying to push their beliefs onto others tend to be the religious people, not the atheists.
The ritual of coming to these kinds of websites to continually preach against the foolishness of all religions based on a belief in the existence of gods, all the while regurgitating the writings of their favorite atheist media mouthpieces. Not all atheists do this, of course. Because not all atheists are 'religious' about their atheism. But a few are, which is why, and how, atheism CAN be held and expressed 'religiously'. Which is the subject of this thread.
So now coming onto a website for the purpose of having a discussion about things makes those things religions?
I often post things on Facebook about how awesome I think Star Trek is - does that mean I follow the Church of Trek?
Of course, what you are doing is defining "religion" in such loose terms that you can include atheism in it. But that means you have to include other things that clearly aren't religions, thus showing the ludicrousness of your position.
So how about you just give a clear and unambiguous definition of what you think "religion" means, okay?