Rainbow Mage
Lib Democrat/Agnostic/Epicurean-ish/Buddhist-ish
I hate to put "Theists Only", but I really don't need atheists de-railing the thread like they always do. Your thoughts everybody?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't identify as a theist, because I'm fussy about precise language, but I do believe in God. Is my perspective welcome?
Okay, thanks for sharing. I believe Jesus was God, in the sense that he was an incarnation of God on earth. I don't believe he was the only one. I believe Jesus was the messiah, but not the Jewish messiah. See I think the Jewish idea of the messiah got perverted, they were expecting a king who seeks political conquest, but the true messiah gives life. I also believe Jesus was the Maitreya, the one who completes the dharma, and hence, he completed the teachings of every prophet and good teacher prior to him. Most importantly, I believe Jesus was enlightened, meaning, he knew God is in us, and any one of us can find God.
I told you I was fussy.Well yes. Do we need to get technical? LOL
Why do you think He wasn't buried?I do believe that he was crucified; however, I think it would be more historically accurate to say that he remained on the cross, was never buried, and most likely was eaten by birds of prey and wild dogs/animals.
Mainly because the common practice was to not allow a burial. The Crucifixion was suppose to humiliate the person completely. Doing so, they would allow the body to remain while wild animals devoured them, adding to the humiliation.Why do you think He wasn't buried?
13And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet.
14And Jesus answered and said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever. And his disciples heard it.
It's not atheists that derail your threads, it's both non-believers and believers of an historical Jesus that derail your thread by debating the historical question. It takes both to tango. Do you always single out and blame black people, or women, or homosexuals when disagreements arise?I hate to put "Theists Only", but I really don't need atheists de-railing the thread like they always do. Your thoughts everybody?
I believe this is what Yosef was speaking about. Nearly every, if not every, discussion about Jesus results in someone making this baseless claim. Especially in this particular thread, the statement you made adds nothing to the discussion.Jesus of Nazareth did not exist as an historical figure, Jesus of early Christianity was the personification of an ideal savior to whom a number of stories were later attached.