There are millions of earths like this.

[FFH]

Joseph Smith Inspired Version of Genesis
Genesis 7: 38

"And were it possible that man could number the particles of the earth, yea, and millions of earths like this, it would not be a beginning to the number of thy creations."

Pearl of Great Price
Moses 7: 30

"And were it possible that man could number the particles of the earth, yea, millons of earths like this, it would not be a beginning to the number of thy creations."

 

[jeffrey]

Seeing that the Universe is never ending, logic dictates that there could be a never ending amount of Earth like planets, even if only 1 in a billion are Earth like.

 

[ChrisP]

logic dictates

NOoooooooooooooooooooooo!!! The atheist pod people have stolen your mind!!! When will it end oh Lord! How many more, how many more :sad4:

 

[jeffrey]

NOoooooooooooooooooooooo!!! The atheist pod people have stolen your mind!!! When will it end oh Lord! How many more, how many more :sad4:

The end result of to many years of rock music played at ear-bleeding levels. ... Just something for you to look forward too!

 

[ChrisP]

The end result of to many years of rock music played at ear-bleeding levels. ... Just something for you to look forward too!

Guess I'm guinea pigging the metal side of things.

 

[jeffrey]

Guess I'm guinea pigging the metal side of things.

And resist Star Trek. Watching Spock only speeds up the inevitable. It will also curse your spelling, as I am a witness to my own demise.

 

[sandy whitelinger]

Seeing that the Universe is never ending, logic dictates that there could be a never ending amount of Earth like planets, even if only 1 in a billion are Earth like.

Logic does ot dictate anything of the sort. Logic says that a lacking a burden of proof is lacking in what you said.

 

[SoyLeche]

Logic does ot dictate anything of the sort. Logic says that a lacking a burden of proof is lacking in what you said.

Does saying that something "could" be really require a burden of proof?

 

[sandy whitelinger]

Does saying that something "could" be really require a burden of proof?

When it comes to logic it does.

 

[Krie]

I think that that is very possible, that is if the government might have invented some kind of illusional space so that all that we see are planets that have no evolution. I mean we can not be the only life out there....

 

[sandy whitelinger]

I I mean we can not be the only life out there....

Of course we can.

 

[Krie]

and you have a closed mind.... there is no use in trying to debate this.

 

[SoyLeche]

and you have a closed mind.... there is no use in trying to debate this.

Not really. He has a point. It is within the realm of possibility that we are the only life forms. I would assign that a very low probability though.

 

[sandy whitelinger]

and you have a closed mind.... there is no use in trying to debate this.

First of all this is not a debate forum but a discussion. Next the concept that there must be life on other planets because there are so many other planets was offered as being logical yet it uses a logic fallacy. The burden of proof is missing.

You offered that there must be other life out there. I said that isn't a must. Simply speaking, either there is or there isn't. Both are possibilities. I just pointed out one of the possibilities. Now you don't want to discuss it and claim that I have a closed mind?:slap: