Shad
Veteran Member
I haven't read the links yet, but if what you're saying is true then that's pretty damning.
It is true. Alexander has been associated with a two horned ram for centuries. The Romances became part of Christian and Jewish theology but not part of the now canon scriptures. Alexander was created as a righteous monotheist icon, you can see this in the story I linked. It wasn't until the 16th century that people discovered he was a "dirty pagan polytheist". Christians and Jews stopped using the Romances, again since none were part of canon. However Islam included the story in canon. The only options are to acknowledge the incorrect folklore in the Quran or to produce horrible arguments using verses that refute the argument it supports or to make up fallacious arguments such as there is only one pass in the Caucasus mountain range as an ad hoc rescue. Nevermind the lowlands near the Black and Caspian Seas which could not be blocked. Keep in mind only Muslims even entertain the idea of Cyrus, academia in general doesn't at all. The only reason for this is due to Islamic theology with the need to defend literalism