Many times have I provided back up.
History of ancient Israel and Judah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Israelite monotheism evolved gradually out of pre-existing beliefs and practices of the ancient world.[76] The religion of the Israelites of Iron Age I, like the Canaanite faith from which it evolved[77] and other ancient Near Eastern religions, was based on a cult of ancestors and worship of family gods (the "gods of the fathers").[78] Its major deities were not numerous El, Asherah, and Yahweh, with Baal as a fourth god, and perhaps Shamash (the sun) in the early period.[79] By the time of the early Hebrew kings, El and Yahweh had become fused and Asherah did not continue as a separate state cult,[79
All quite meaningless to me. I would sooner hold to the arm of God then that of the flesh. He knows where we are going.
How honest is that since you use the known errors in the bible as your only source.
Known errors, you say? Known by whom? Mankind, in all his imperfections or God, in his perfection.
Does that ghost look like a professor or imagination
What does imagination look like?
So your very ignorant to the credible history not in dispute?
http://www.beyondintractability.org/contributors/norman-shultzHistorical
Historical accounts are subject to frequent disagreement. Much disagreement is due to the fact that accurate history is difficult to obtain, for a variety of reasons. Much information regarding the past has been lost. Many cultures have a rich oral history, but lack written documents. Oral accounts, or "story telling," suffer from an inherent loss of information. Each person in the chain will tend to "interpret" the story, presenting the opportunity to accidentally alter it, or worse, to slant the story to one's own tastes before passing it on. Written history before the age of copiers and computers had to be hand-copied, providing similarly easy opportunities for errors or exaggeration. Some material is simply propaganda, intentionally containing little or no truth. Even if authentic, the meaning of documents regarding the past can be highly unclear to any modern investigator, or can conflict with other sources. These factors and others result in quite a bit of uncertainty about historical accounts. This leaves room for parties to interpret history in ways that favor them, resulting in strong resistance from those on opposing sides.
I provided sources, you provide imagination and ignore that fact.
Your facts reside in your imagination. You imagine that mankind is more knowledgeable then God.
Your in the dark with no light.
Well, I have yet to fall.
I actually fight for the historicity of jesus, its just how ignorant you are of the topic you chose to debate. And against some of the brighter mythicist, that would put you to shame, more shame then your placing on yourself here.
You think that one can only obtain knowledge from other people, who all have biases and impartiality. It is OK to read but the words are not always true.
Actually some of the best there are. You know authors and such.
Yes, I know. I am an author, are you.
You seem to be quite clear to be following blindly mythology on topics you know nothing about.
You seem to be quite eager and willing to tell me that I am ignorant. That is called projecting. You are projecting onto me the characteristics you possess.
And when given the opportunity to learn from a professor, you turned your nose at it deciding that wallowing in ignorance was a better choice
I just do not know what to say to this. I know some really stupid professors. The word Professor does not make you an authority of the world, it makes you a specialist in a particular field. You need to redirect your worship of professors to God.
