ok, then take it like this...think back to your school days and imagine your classroom teachers response to questions such as that. As i recall both being a student in school and given i was also a school teacher, your question is nothing more than a stupid timewasting disctraction coming from a student who is clowning around!
If your question is genuine, then at least ask it in a manner that befits the importance of the question.
OK, the OP topic of discussion is SBTL's claim that there is not enough erosion for the earth to be old. I picked up the thread when some where arguing that the salinity of the oceans was evidence for this and disagreed. You responded with two links one irrelevant one about how to calculate residence times which I pointed out was irrelevant because residence times such as 2-10 days for water vapor are not relevant to the length of the systems existence. I gather you have accepted that as you haven't responded.
You also posted a link to
The Effect of Ocean Salinity on Climate and Its Implications for Earth's Habitability
which you first claimed I claimed it was a YEC article, upon disabusing you of that notion, I read it again and determined that it is a discussion of a model of some climatic effects of various levels of salinity. It was primarily aimed at the early earth but because it is a useful model it could also be applied to massive changes in the current levels of salinity. You bolded a sentence in the paper but I could not see how it supports your argument. here are the keywords for the paper.
Keywords: Archean Earth, Faint Young Sun, habitability, salinity, GCM, climate
nothing about the age of the earth.
I left the forum to live my life and came back and going back to the original conversation asked what this paper you posted had to do with salinity and calculating the age of the earth.
You claimed teaching experience and asked for a more complete question and so I have endeavored to do so above, please have the courtesy to respond in more fullness.