• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Things I Learned on RF Today

McBell

Unbound
I learned that there are some Americans who understand the metric
kuhyjfgljkbpiuh.JPG

more examples here
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Hmm, what definition were they using? It does not appear to be a geological defintion:

"In geology, a boulder (or rarely bowlder)[1] is a rock fragment with size greater than 25.6 cm (10.1 in) in diameter.[2] Smaller pieces are called cobbles and pebbles. While a boulder may be small enough to move or roll manually, others are extremely massive.[3] In common usage, a boulder is too large for a person to move. Smaller boulders are usually just called rocks or stones."

The minimal size of a boulder does not appear to have a metric or an Imperial basis. But the article at least appears to be using the definition of "rock too big for a person to move" since I have moved boulders at least twice as large as the minimum size of a boulder.
 
Top