I think you misunderstand the relationshipDon't try to deflect as usual. @esmith did you ever have an IQ test?
between the monkey & the football.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think you misunderstand the relationshipDon't try to deflect as usual. @esmith did you ever have an IQ test?
Um... I think you're getting defensive, for some reason. I was relaying may experience. I sincerely believe anyone can be taught to think critically and use evidence based practice. The fact, however, is that many people aren't and don't, and they're the people I'm talking about.
Evidence is evidence. Interpretation of evidence is somewhat subjective, but if you lack the tools to do it yourself, it's sensible to find an expert who know's what their doing. Two different people can look at the same piece of evidence and come up with different interpretations, but, and this is important, there's a huge difference between differences of interpretation, and outright misrepresentations of, evidence.
If someone is a Trump supporter based on critical thinking and evidence, hey, good for them. I may disagree with them over subjectivity, but I'll not for an instant criticise them. What I DO criticise, is the people who, for whatever reason, support Trump UN critically. My post was a comment purely about them, and my own failure to reach them.
... and?
what does an IQ test have to do with the term "monkey f***ing a football"Have you ever had an IQ test?
Ah, can't answer a simple question? I'm used to the conservative culture not answering simple questions. Care to try again?what does an IQ test have to do with the term "monkey f***ing a football"
Seems to me you need to get outside that bubble of yours. The term basically means:
"Energetic but useless action, or a person engaged in such action"
Found wide acceptance during the Vietnam War to describe certain decisions or actions.
He is indeed appalling.I was, and still am utterly appalled by Trump.
He is indeed appalling.
But the wise voter must consider the effects each candidate would have in office.
Sometimes the more appalling one will do less damage.
But many voters just choose based upon likeability, without much thought to
whether the likely result will comport with their own values & agendas.
I don't think it's worth exerting energy over such a hypothesisFor all I know, Trump will prove to have been
just the medicine.
The prophets who said he could not win are
the same ones saying he will bring doom.
As for likable..lets imagine, the cruise ship sinks,
and here you are alone, alone, all all alone
in a lifeboat with, take you pick, Trump of Hillary.
I don't think it's worth exerting energy over such a hypothesis
You're only saying that because you're brainwashed by CNN and MSNBC to say that.This Is How Fox News Brainwashes Its Viewers: Our In-Depth Investigation of the Propaganda Cycle
A good time as any for people to learn and understand what propaganda is, how it's used and how to recognize it. This is not a biased piece. Learn the techniques with examples and pictures.
https://www.autostraddle.com/this-i...investigation-of-the-propaganda-cycle-297107/
View attachment 23389 View attachment 23390 View attachment 23391 View attachment 23392
Read the article, learn what propaganda is. You just proved the OP.You're only saying that because you're brainwashed by CNN and MSNBC to say that.
I knew you would say that too.Read the article, learn what propaganda is. You just proved the OP.
This all sounds pretty good to me......prefer libertarian approaches that puts sanctity on individual....many anti-war statements and demands for peaceful solutions especially in regards to North Korea and Iran, his pro-free trade stances....strong opposition to any kind of crony capitalism, etc.
Because it's trueI knew you would say that too.
OK, I'll play your childish game.Ah, can't answer a simple question? I'm used to the conservative culture not answering simple questions. Care to try again?
What was your role on the ship?OK, I'll play your childish game.
Answer: I don't remember.
I do remember taking the Navy's tests to determine what specialty, if any, one is suited for when one first goes in, then test to determine if one is qualified to advance to the next pay-grade (test only one aspect in making that determination). Then the FCC test for 1st Class Radio Telephone License with Radar endorsement. The the test for a Class B CDL.
That satisfies your childish complaint about conservatives not answering a simple question, or do you want additional information?
Started out as a Fire Control Technician Guns, advancing to Senior Chief Petty Office and assumed the duties as Command Career Counselor then Senior Enlisted Advisor> FYI not all time was spent aboard ship, was an Instructor at FT"A" and "C" schools, plus other duty assignments.What was your role on the ship?