Slaedi7324
Member
I believe that we should "reboot the world."
Every single human should unite to a One World Government, even force every human to one big landmass, one country.
And let them live in that one and only country, a new life.
A place where misconceptions, misinformations, false statements, lies, bigotry and racism aren't available.
Only facts, historical facts, scientific facts and anything that is factual or substantiated proof supporting a legend, such as Moses, Jesus, Buddha.
One impartial education system for everyone, not some, but everyone. Not just a few knows and the rest are stupid idiots, but we all know.
Religions that teach inaccurate things such as Earth is flat or 6,000 years old should be eradicated. Religions are only allowed as philosophies or religions that are not incompatible to the scientific world.
Just imagine, no Young Creationists, no evolution-deniers, no Holocaust-deniers, no white supremacists, no ignoramuses.
This is because there would be no parents that will teach the children. but teachers teaching children. And we aren't speaking about public-school level of a teacher, I believe that if we go by this New World Order, we can eventually be extremely intelligent at only the age of 8! What is usually known as a 9th grade, usually achieved at 16 years of age, could be achieved at a much younger age, probably at 8!
In order to make this happen, the child would be forced out of the family after 5 years old. He will live in one big state-owned institution with a new "family" (basically a boarding school with no possibility to ever meet your family again, and basically learn to live with your new family that will be with you until you're 25 and fully graduated).
University-level of teachers will teach children about various topics, without simplify it, at a relatively young age.
This will be because the children are not products of the culture and environment they are from, as well as parents. But instead, the products of schools, government teachings.
They won't hate, say, homosexuals because a book tell them to hate them, they will not resort to the same fallaciously, laughable, petty arguments that has been debunked countless of times.
If they hate it, they would be writing scientific documents on why they believe it is wrong, as neutral and scientific as possible. If it is accepted as fact, he's correct. If not, he should change his opinion to the correct one, if he refuses and secretly keep teaching this, he will get to jail, we don't need more believers of misinformation.
There will be no pathetic protests that are against something good.
Internet would most likely decay too, because taking a look at the YouTube comments makes me doubt my philosophy. People wouldn't learn, orally [I've heard that...]. But through credible sources [According to.., therefore...].
If a person wants to learn something, he shouldn't quote RationalWiki, Wikipedia or a YouTube video. But from something credible, such as a book by a renowned author, perhaps a scientist or a historian that accurately documents these, say, scientific or historic facts (the government will determine true educational books and partial propaganda).
Russia wouldn't teach one perspective and no other, America one, but no other and China from a third perspective, while ignoring the rest of the perspectives.
What is historical, thus subjective, will capture all of the perspectives, but strongly suggests to rely on what the book calls for the most plausible and substantiated perspective.
What is scientific, thus objectively impartial, shall capture only the true perspective and ignore the others that are false that some countries might be teaching.
It's basically eugenics of many kinds; no stupid people, no intellectually disabled people, no propaganda and no evil people (Theft? Execution. Rape? Execution, as well as the victim. Murder? Torture for 10 years until the last day where you will be executed, there will be no "lesser" punishment, if you violate the rules, you will face capital punishment. Even though, this seems too harsh, that's the effective way of a peaceful place where people are too scarred of doing crimes, because if they aren't caught, great for them, but they eventually will and then they will be executed.)
Things that can be achieved by observational breeding. If someone seems to be a danger for the civilized world, it will be executed. There will also be a children restriction, only 2 children. If more, all the children will be executed and the parents would be sterilized.
That is my philosophy. Every human living by one and same Government, with one perspective of the facts, not all the rest of the lies. Some would call it for a dictatorship, but I suppose, this would be a true utopia. A pacifist world.
Do you agree with my worldview? I know that the leaders of the country could eventually become corrupt, but if we imagine a theoretical leader that will never become corrupt nor his successors. What do you think then?
Every single human should unite to a One World Government, even force every human to one big landmass, one country.
And let them live in that one and only country, a new life.
A place where misconceptions, misinformations, false statements, lies, bigotry and racism aren't available.
Only facts, historical facts, scientific facts and anything that is factual or substantiated proof supporting a legend, such as Moses, Jesus, Buddha.
One impartial education system for everyone, not some, but everyone. Not just a few knows and the rest are stupid idiots, but we all know.
Religions that teach inaccurate things such as Earth is flat or 6,000 years old should be eradicated. Religions are only allowed as philosophies or religions that are not incompatible to the scientific world.
Just imagine, no Young Creationists, no evolution-deniers, no Holocaust-deniers, no white supremacists, no ignoramuses.
This is because there would be no parents that will teach the children. but teachers teaching children. And we aren't speaking about public-school level of a teacher, I believe that if we go by this New World Order, we can eventually be extremely intelligent at only the age of 8! What is usually known as a 9th grade, usually achieved at 16 years of age, could be achieved at a much younger age, probably at 8!
In order to make this happen, the child would be forced out of the family after 5 years old. He will live in one big state-owned institution with a new "family" (basically a boarding school with no possibility to ever meet your family again, and basically learn to live with your new family that will be with you until you're 25 and fully graduated).
University-level of teachers will teach children about various topics, without simplify it, at a relatively young age.
This will be because the children are not products of the culture and environment they are from, as well as parents. But instead, the products of schools, government teachings.
They won't hate, say, homosexuals because a book tell them to hate them, they will not resort to the same fallaciously, laughable, petty arguments that has been debunked countless of times.
If they hate it, they would be writing scientific documents on why they believe it is wrong, as neutral and scientific as possible. If it is accepted as fact, he's correct. If not, he should change his opinion to the correct one, if he refuses and secretly keep teaching this, he will get to jail, we don't need more believers of misinformation.
There will be no pathetic protests that are against something good.
Internet would most likely decay too, because taking a look at the YouTube comments makes me doubt my philosophy. People wouldn't learn, orally [I've heard that...]. But through credible sources [According to.., therefore...].
If a person wants to learn something, he shouldn't quote RationalWiki, Wikipedia or a YouTube video. But from something credible, such as a book by a renowned author, perhaps a scientist or a historian that accurately documents these, say, scientific or historic facts (the government will determine true educational books and partial propaganda).
Russia wouldn't teach one perspective and no other, America one, but no other and China from a third perspective, while ignoring the rest of the perspectives.
What is historical, thus subjective, will capture all of the perspectives, but strongly suggests to rely on what the book calls for the most plausible and substantiated perspective.
What is scientific, thus objectively impartial, shall capture only the true perspective and ignore the others that are false that some countries might be teaching.
It's basically eugenics of many kinds; no stupid people, no intellectually disabled people, no propaganda and no evil people (Theft? Execution. Rape? Execution, as well as the victim. Murder? Torture for 10 years until the last day where you will be executed, there will be no "lesser" punishment, if you violate the rules, you will face capital punishment. Even though, this seems too harsh, that's the effective way of a peaceful place where people are too scarred of doing crimes, because if they aren't caught, great for them, but they eventually will and then they will be executed.)
Things that can be achieved by observational breeding. If someone seems to be a danger for the civilized world, it will be executed. There will also be a children restriction, only 2 children. If more, all the children will be executed and the parents would be sterilized.
That is my philosophy. Every human living by one and same Government, with one perspective of the facts, not all the rest of the lies. Some would call it for a dictatorship, but I suppose, this would be a true utopia. A pacifist world.
Do you agree with my worldview? I know that the leaders of the country could eventually become corrupt, but if we imagine a theoretical leader that will never become corrupt nor his successors. What do you think then?
