• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

This is my philosophy - agree with it or no?

methylatedghosts

Can't brain. Has dumb.
?
It's basically eugenics of many kinds; no stupid people, no intellectually disabled people, no propaganda and no evil people (Theft? Execution. Rape? Execution, as well as the victim. Murder? Torture for 10 years until the last day where you will be executed, there will be no "lesser" punishment, if you violate the rules, you will face capital punishment. Even though, this seems too harsh, that's the effective way of a peaceful place where people are too scarred of doing crimes, because if they aren't caught, great for them, but they eventually will and then they will be executed.)

Things that can be achieved by observational breeding. If someone seems to be a danger for the civilized world, it will be executed.
oh, peace, you elusive ideal. How do we get you to stick around? Oh yeah, torture and kill everyone! Brilliant! Why has no one thought of this before!
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
We of my creed are also the ones doing the most to alleviate the sufferings of others. We have enough philosophical atheist iconoclasts sitting on their couches directing traffic for others to carry out.

Christianity does not welcome suffering, it accepts it will always be part of the human experience, physical and emotional, and recognizes the virtues in it as well. No gratitude in the heart of a demanding complaining privileged one. Jesus suffered greatly for our sins and asks us to pick up our crosses and bear our sufferings for others as well.
And your Church does this by teaching people in Africa that condoms won't help stop the spread of HIV and AIDs, by glorifying poverty as martyrdom, and up until recently by hiding or otherwise protecting the pedophiles in the priesthood?

You'll forgive me for asking that you try something different.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
Hmm... if you're philosophy was in anyway implemented, I'd probably find myself on the side of actively fighting against it.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Hmm... if you're philosophy was in anyway implemented, I'd probably find myself on the side of actively fighting against it.
And I would toss aside our political and other differences and be fighting right at your side.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
A facetious OP against education and knowledge, using red herrings and straw men and other fallacies, how brilliant!
 

thau

Well-Known Member
And your Church does this by teaching people in Africa that condoms won't help stop the spread of HIV and AIDs, by glorifying poverty as martyrdom, and up until recently by hiding or otherwise protecting the pedophiles in the priesthood?

You'll forgive me for asking that you try something different.

I will forgive you for any and all that you ask for.

The sin of artificial contraception has merits far beyond your willing to understand or concede. It is true it became more difficult to make such an appeal in the wake of an AIDS crisis. Perhaps the Church was slow to respond but the pope did declare condoms were acceptable in such cases.

So you in all your supreme wisdom have found fault in the Church at some secular level. I guess that makes you the victor, you have dethroned the Catholic Church and Jesus Christ over this matter. All other enormous acts of charity, sacrifice, forgiveness and piety can now be discarded.
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
@Quintessence

To each their own. I strongly disagree with your views and oppose them as I see no benefits in them, but I believe that this philosophy is the only way to achieve peace, from a person who understands the perspective.

Have you considered that a wiser path to peace is to live and let live and really do that "to each their own" instead of shoving your own values and ideals in everyone else's faces? Demanding everyone else do as you do is the very stuff of war, racism, bigotry, oppressors, and intolerance. I do hope that you realize that. I mean, I admire the spirit of what you're getting at, but the means you suggest produces precisely what you hope to avoid.
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
I suppose you didn't read the OP. How pathetic.
I did and as someone who generally supports more authoritarian systems of government(Enlightened Despotism specifically) I think your concept goes too far in one direction. The society you're proposing would quickly stagnate, and lose not just the worst parts of the various cultures but the best parts as well. While I agree with, say, holocaust denial & creationism being offenses that are punishable by law, I do not think children should be taken from families without cause.
 

Nietzsche

The Last Prussian
Premium Member
I will forgive you for any and all that you ask for.

The sin of artificial contraception has merits far beyond your willing to understand or concede. It is true it became more difficult to make such an appeal in the wake of an AIDS crisis. Perhaps the Church was slow to respond but the pope did declare condoms were acceptable in such cases.

So you in all your supreme wisdom have found fault in the Church at some secular level. I guess that makes you the victor, you have dethroned the Catholic Church and Jesus Christ over this matter. All other enormous acts of charity, sacrifice, forgiveness and piety can now be discarded.
Good people will be good regardless of the banner they fly. The only thing the Church has to aid in that is its infrastructure and wealth
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
While I agree with, say, holocaust denial & creationism being offenses that are punishable by law.....
Uh oh, don't try this stuff in Revoltistan.....it can make one's trigger finger itch. (We're always looking for a reason to be revolting.)
 

Slaedi7324

Member
I did and as someone who generally supports more authoritarian systems of government(Enlightened Despotism specifically) I think your concept goes too far in one direction. The society you're proposing would quickly stagnate, and lose not just the worst parts of the various cultures but the best parts as well. While I agree with, say, holocaust denial & creationism being offenses that are punishable by law, I do not think children should be taken from families without cause.
I didn't talk to you, my friend.

Though, I think if advancement would only happen if children are taken from families and I did come with a cause.

Bigotry, racism, religion are usually from families. Families with their outdated worldviews teaches children that evolution is wrong for no apparent reason other than it conflicts with Creationism.

These children grow up with these brainwashing ideas and become the product of their parents. Ignorance is like a virus, it spreads to your next generation.

During the age of 5, children are usually at the age of starting to understanding the world and rejecting fairytales and accept reality, thus, we should present them the reality rather than fairytales such as Young Creationism or that Black people are talking apes compared to "humans."

A government wouldn't be so opinionated and teach the child from an impartial perspective, we must deviate them from the families then, in order to succeed this.

About cultures, the various will be remembered in history, just like Red Indians and Scotsmen. While the best will be continued with some diversity with other good cultures, as long as it is compatible to main point of my philosophy; promoting knowledge.

Thus, multiculturalism will be promoted, we wouldn't cultureless. The worst of the best will be eradicated and the best of the best of any culture will be incorporated with the main country's society.
 

Slaedi7324

Member
Have you considered that a wiser path to peace is to live and let live and really do that "to each their own" instead of shoving your own values and ideals in everyone else's faces?
No. Because we lose wisdom that way. If all the great scientists just had shut up and never shared their opinions and knowledge, we would never progress to this point we are now.
 
Top