Slaedi7324
Member
No, it's not.That is a demonstrable lie.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, it's not.That is a demonstrable lie.
oh, peace, you elusive ideal. How do we get you to stick around? Oh yeah, torture and kill everyone! Brilliant! Why has no one thought of this before!It's basically eugenics of many kinds; no stupid people, no intellectually disabled people, no propaganda and no evil people (Theft? Execution. Rape? Execution, as well as the victim. Murder? Torture for 10 years until the last day where you will be executed, there will be no "lesser" punishment, if you violate the rules, you will face capital punishment. Even though, this seems too harsh, that's the effective way of a peaceful place where people are too scarred of doing crimes, because if they aren't caught, great for them, but they eventually will and then they will be executed.)
Things that can be achieved by observational breeding. If someone seems to be a danger for the civilized world, it will be executed.
And your Church does this by teaching people in Africa that condoms won't help stop the spread of HIV and AIDs, by glorifying poverty as martyrdom, and up until recently by hiding or otherwise protecting the pedophiles in the priesthood?We of my creed are also the ones doing the most to alleviate the sufferings of others. We have enough philosophical atheist iconoclasts sitting on their couches directing traffic for others to carry out.
Christianity does not welcome suffering, it accepts it will always be part of the human experience, physical and emotional, and recognizes the virtues in it as well. No gratitude in the heart of a demanding complaining privileged one. Jesus suffered greatly for our sins and asks us to pick up our crosses and bear our sufferings for others as well.
Why?Hmm... if you're philosophy was in anyway implemented, I'd probably find myself on the side of actively fighting against it.
Why?
And I would toss aside our political and other differences and be fighting right at your side.Hmm... if you're philosophy was in anyway implemented, I'd probably find myself on the side of actively fighting against it.
Change "philosophy" to "narcissistic rant" and I'm in.And I would toss aside our political and other differences and be fighting right at your side.Hmm... if you're philosophy was in anyway implemented, I'd probably find myself on the side of actively fighting against it.
And I would toss aside our political and other differences and be fighting right at your side.
Change "philosophy" to "narcissistic rant" and I'm in.
I'll send you 2 guys applications for the RF gun club.And I would toss aside our political and other differences and be fighting right at your side.
I suppose you didn't read the OP. How pathetic.A facetious OP against education and knowledge, using red herrings and straw men and other fallacies, how brilliant!
And your Church does this by teaching people in Africa that condoms won't help stop the spread of HIV and AIDs, by glorifying poverty as martyrdom, and up until recently by hiding or otherwise protecting the pedophiles in the priesthood?
You'll forgive me for asking that you try something different.
@Quintessence
To each their own. I strongly disagree with your views and oppose them as I see no benefits in them, but I believe that this philosophy is the only way to achieve peace, from a person who understands the perspective.
I did and as someone who generally supports more authoritarian systems of government(Enlightened Despotism specifically) I think your concept goes too far in one direction. The society you're proposing would quickly stagnate, and lose not just the worst parts of the various cultures but the best parts as well. While I agree with, say, holocaust denial & creationism being offenses that are punishable by law, I do not think children should be taken from families without cause.I suppose you didn't read the OP. How pathetic.
Good people will be good regardless of the banner they fly. The only thing the Church has to aid in that is its infrastructure and wealthI will forgive you for any and all that you ask for.
The sin of artificial contraception has merits far beyond your willing to understand or concede. It is true it became more difficult to make such an appeal in the wake of an AIDS crisis. Perhaps the Church was slow to respond but the pope did declare condoms were acceptable in such cases.
So you in all your supreme wisdom have found fault in the Church at some secular level. I guess that makes you the victor, you have dethroned the Catholic Church and Jesus Christ over this matter. All other enormous acts of charity, sacrifice, forgiveness and piety can now be discarded.
Uh oh, don't try this stuff in Revoltistan.....it can make one's trigger finger itch. (We're always looking for a reason to be revolting.)While I agree with, say, holocaust denial & creationism being offenses that are punishable by law.....
I didn't talk to you, my friend.I did and as someone who generally supports more authoritarian systems of government(Enlightened Despotism specifically) I think your concept goes too far in one direction. The society you're proposing would quickly stagnate, and lose not just the worst parts of the various cultures but the best parts as well. While I agree with, say, holocaust denial & creationism being offenses that are punishable by law, I do not think children should be taken from families without cause.
No. Because we lose wisdom that way. If all the great scientists just had shut up and never shared their opinions and knowledge, we would never progress to this point we are now.Have you considered that a wiser path to peace is to live and let live and really do that "to each their own" instead of shoving your own values and ideals in everyone else's faces?