Viker
Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
You forgot deep and shallow.You forgot "wide".
Actually, scrap that. We're all in that category.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You forgot deep and shallow.You forgot "wide".
Actually, scrap that. We're all in that category.
Wide, medium, & narrow are merely subsets.
We need to create a diagram to keep track.You forgot deep and shallow.
Nein.We need to create a diagram to keep track.
So, we have:
Deep, wide and tall atheists (DWTs)
Deep, wide and short atheists (DWSs)
Deep, wide and medium atheists (DWMs)
Shallow, wide and tall atheists (SWTs)
Shallow, wide and short atheists (SWSs)
Shallow, wide and medium atheists (SWMs)
I'm rocking with my SWM brethren, personally.
Alright, let's get editing.Nein.
Alle gute dinge sind drei.
Is there a difference between:
It seems to me that all such people could reasonably be called Atheists
- A person who doesn't believe in God as they have never heard of God and don't know who/what God is supposed to be (so has nothing to do with religion)
- A person who sees no reason to believe in God and who finds arguments for God to be unconvincing (so has nothing to do with religion)
- A person who is positively convinced that there is no God (so has nothing to do with religion)
Yet they are entirely different things
So, does this mean there are three types of Atheists?
Or does this mean that our language is out of touch with reality?
We're kind of like The Blob, in that respect.One type of atheist, several different ways of getting there.
Except for the third one. I capitalize "Atheist" (and "Agnostic") when talking about people who hold to the philosophy of Atheism (or Agnosticism) and use the minor for the colloquial definitions.Yes, that is a good post. But please stop calling them Atheists. They are atheists.
One type of atheist, several different ways of getting there.
Is there a difference between:
It seems to me that all such people could reasonably be called Atheists
- A person who doesn't believe in God as they have never heard of God and don't know who/what God is supposed to be (so has nothing to do with religion)
- A person who sees no reason to believe in God and who finds arguments for God to be unconvincing (so has nothing to do with religion)
- A person who is positively convinced that there is no God (so has nothing to do with religion)
Yet they are entirely different things
So, does this mean there are three types of Atheists?
Or does this mean that our language is out of touch with reality?
There is a difference but the commonality is most relevant for most cases.Is there a difference between:
It seems to me that all such people could reasonably be called Atheists
- A person who doesn't believe in God as they have never heard of God and don't know who/what God is supposed to be (so has nothing to do with religion)
- A person who sees no reason to believe in God and who finds arguments for God to be unconvincing (so has nothing to do with religion)
- A person who is positively convinced that there is no God (so has nothing to do with religion)
Yet they are entirely different things
So, does this mean there are three types of Atheists?
Or does this mean that our language is out of touch with reality?
How about people who believe in spirits, but do not believe in God? Think afterlife is like this one - countries, different groups, but no one spirit who is all powerful - is that an athiest too?
No. Only one type.Is there a difference between:
It seems to me that all such people could reasonably be called Atheists
- A person who doesn't believe in God as they have never heard of God and don't know who/what God is supposed to be (so has nothing to do with religion)
- A person who sees no reason to believe in God and who finds arguments for God to be unconvincing (so has nothing to do with religion)
- A person who is positively convinced that there is no God (so has nothing to do with religion)
Yet they are entirely different things
So, does this mean there are three types of Atheists?
Or does this mean that our language is out of touch with reality?
No. Only one type.
One without God's.
Hint: One
There are many types of gods.There are also gods. Your culture is showing.
How about people who believe in spirits, but do not believe in God? Think afterlife is like this one - countries, different groups, but no one spirit who is all powerful - is that an athiest too?
And I'll tell you what, it gets absolutely exhausting spending the energy necessary having to not believe in each and every one of them.There are also gods. Your culture is showing.
There are many types of gods.
Only one type of Atheist.
Not in accordance with the etymology.No, there are at least 3 for atheists.
And I'll tell you what, it gets absolutely exhausting spending the energy necessary having to not believe in each and every one of them.
Not in accordance with the etymology.
atheist | Etymology of atheist by etymonline
"godless person, one who denies the existence of a supreme, intelligent being to whom… See origin and meaning of atheist.www.etymonline.com