Greetings all. Thanks for all the interesting feedback. This is my first time being registered to any kind of forum so I was kind of nervous as to whether people would read let alone respond to it so you guys basically made my day (haha sad I know).
Firstly, I just want to say that this thread is by no means just limited to Self-Proclaimed Christians. I just put it there to catch peoples attention. Anyone (regardless of religious affiliation) by all means is more than welcome to put forth his/her opinion and I apologize to all those who felt they had no right in a sense to write what they thought due to the title.
Secondly, I was a bit apprehensive about the kind of feedback I was going to get (if any) in that this being a religious forum, I expected a lot of devoted people who would take enormous offense at what I have written and verbally attack me, which has yet to happen. So I would like this time to thank those who have held back.
Thirdly, I would like to refine what I have said about science replacing religion. What I meant was that science has replaced the INITIAL purpose of religion in explaining the unexplainable (this doesnt necessarily mean science has replaced religion as a whole). Back in history, people didnt know about a lot of things, like weather and agriculture, etc. which is why they made up religion and deities because it was the only plausible cause they could think of that would explain such things. No one has ever seen a deity or God, yet there are sculptures and pictures, which probably came in dreams or imaginations. However, through scientific advancements, we have figured out why it rains, why it shines, why we get certain diseases and such that through this knowledge we have learned to predict, control and even manipulate the things we previously lived in fear of, thus no longer needing a deity per se to explain such things.
However, there are still things science has yet (probably never) to discover, which is the proof of Gods existence, existence of hell and heaven, that necessitates a divine being to explain this mystery (today's religion), which I think can be used as a mean of control. Science has undergone many upheavals in its view of the world such as the world being round, the heliocentric model of the solar system, electricity, magnetism, quantum mechanics, general relativity, and string theory (maybe) that have been proven (except the last one) and thus have no room for doubt. For religion, this is anything but. With this but religion can never be refuted against for there is no proof to base anything on, except the Bible or other religious texts (if you call that proof), and there will never be upheavals in religion which explains why it has survived for so long without change, thus leaving it very open to be used as a tool for control.
Fourthly, I have yet to find a sufficient answer for my question what is religion and its purpose? and I remain verycurious
Regarding the statement about TRUSTING that God exists was aimed for those who claim belief in God. Though I realize Im in no position to advise, it was something I felt I had to say.
I would also like to add that Im in a very weary state of confusion right now. I dont know whether Im for or against religion, for or against God, etc.. I would like nothing more than to get out of this gray area and establish a side and believe by it instead of saying random things that serve no purpose.
Lastly (and most importantly) what in blazes is a frubal???
P.S. I had a earlier, much better version of this ready, but something went wrong during sending and I had to write this all over again from scratch L.