I'd mentioned that the temperature is abnormally cold here on Long Island, due to the wildfires in Canada. So the smoke has changed our climate, but it appears to have done the opposite of the greenhouse effect that is warming our planet. I don't know if anyone else here was curious about these effects on climate change, and how this could be. I was curious, so I did some online searching and learned something new today.
"So, fire aerosols have a mixed effect. They can cool the atmosphere at high altitudes, or warm the air — and even melt ice — at Earth’s surface. This dual effect is why no one would suggest that fires are a good way to compensate for global warming. In fact, scientists like Jiang note, any cooling probably takes place only in the region where the fires occur, not widely across the globe... It’s just a weird irony that the warming climate that can foster wildfires may undergo a temporary cooling when catastrophic wildfires do erupt. As the planet warms and new fires flare up, scientists will continue to explore the big impact of tiny fire aerosols that temporarily occupy our atmosphere."
The entire article at Science News Explores was fascinating, and here's the link for anyone who wants to read more about this:
Severe wildfires are becoming more common. Science is showing that the tiny particles they release into the air can alter Earth’s temperature — sometimes cooling it.
www.snexplores.org
Knowing this probably won't make anybody feel better about what's happening. But, if anybody says to you that climate change is a hoax because the wildfire smoke from Canada has dropped the temperature in the nearby regions instead of making things warmer in these regions, this explains the how and why of it.