• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"Top Ten Shocking Beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses"

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I am SHOCKED! that there seems to be no Jews who are able to warn the Jehovah's Witnesses and their governing body that they must stop calling themselves Jehovah.
 

ninerbuff

godless wonder
Here's other's I've learned:

Women HAVE to be sub serviant to their husbands NO MATTER WHAT. And kids can easily be molested because unless there is a confession or TWO WITNESSES, it never happened. Hearsay doesn't matter.
 

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Technically they're not calling themselves Jehovah, they're calling themselves his Witnesses.
In theory. They say that to leave the group is to leave Jehovah. So, what do they call themselves in theory? Imagine all the Jehovah's Witnesses are just one person which isn't so hard to do as they are being taught the one mind. Now, imagine you become joined with that one person, but you can't become the one mind, so you leave. That one person now accuses you of leaving Jehovah, but you did not leave Jehovah; you left the one mind. They do not say, "you have left the one mind" which is true. They say, "you have left Jehovah" which is not true. Do you understand now?
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
I understand what you're trying to get at, but it's misrepresentation. If they believe that they are the only ones who truly worship Jehovah, and are - as his Witnesses - his favored people, then leaving that people is to also leave that god.

It's really no different than any other Christian group saying that by leaving their church you've also "left God".
 

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I understand what you're trying to get at, but it's misrepresentation. If they believe that they are the only ones who truly worship Jehovah, and are - as his Witnesses - his favored people, then leaving that people is to also leave that god.

It's really no different than any other Christian group saying that by leaving their church you've also "left God".
OK. I can agree with that. But, it is wrong to assume that anyone knows what it is to leave Jehovah. Only Jehovah knows. Right?
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
Then they're still making a claim that every other Christian group claims - the mind of their god. I'm not disagreeing that they're wrong, but they're not claiming to be Jehovah himself.
 

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Then they're still making a claim that every other Christian group claims - the mind of their god. I'm not disagreeing that they're wrong, but they're not claiming to be Jehovah himself.
Right. Nobody claims it out-loud. God alone knows righteousness. But, some people say they know it. That's all I'm saying. Whenever anybody says, "I know what is right and true" it is as though they are really saying, "I am God".
 

Samael_Khan

Qigong / Yang Style Taijiquan / 7 Star Mantis
Yes. I am prejudiced.
Very much so.

Here it is in a nutshell:

I do not trust that any non-believer of any belief system will present those beliefs fairly, honestly or correctly. There is no, and I repeat, NO, incentive for a non-believer to present the beliefs of any religion in a positive, or even fairly neutral, way, because there is no such thing as a neutral position in religion.

In order to check to see if that informant is correct in what s/he says ABOUT the target religion, one will have to go to a believer to confirm it. Since this is so, it's better just to go to a believer in the first place.

Consider: there is no incentive for a believer to lie about what his/her beliefs actually are. I mean, the POINT is to convert people, right? Or at least, to have people think well of them and/or not hate them?

So why lie about it? WE might end up thinking those beliefs are strange, but when we do, we will have an honest comparison to make that judgment call. I think we can make up our own minds.

So yeah, I'm a Mormon. You might think we have strange beliefs, and to you they may well be. However, unless you got the information ABOUT Mormonism FROM A MORMON, you don't really know if those beliefs are actually 'Mormon" or not.

Because no third party is going to present them honestly even if they intend to and think they are. It's not possible.

..............................that's why I won't go to third party sources for information about the beliefs of any system.

So....is the guy in this video a JW or not? If he is, then you have poisoned the well pretty thoroughly by characterizing those beliefs as 'shocking,' in an attempt to prejudice the viewers.

I find that sort of thing to be underhanded at best.

I would say that you shouldn't solely trust a non believer or a believer of a certain religion. They are both biased to some degree as you say.

What you do is go to a believers publications to confirm what is being said. The cool thing about JW's is that their beliefs are open for others to see. So it is easy to confirm these things. But to truly get the meet of the issue one must download the JW Library app because that has loads of information as to what they actually learn as believers.

But then, what if believers are told not to communicate with people who have left the group. If there is something wrong going on then how else would you find out? Only by personal experience isn't it?

Say, for instance, if you are a part of a certain group. The Australian government actually investigates child abuse problems within that group. It is not on apostate websites, but on a Governments website. So therefore it is true is it not? And if ex members of said group post this truth then they aren't being biased are they? They are telling the truth.

If you as a believer are only able to watch what your group says you much watch, then what if they only show you the good things bout them and never show you the bad?

You are also showing bias by not going to third sources because for all you know the group is only telling you the good things. You must compare what they say with other third party sources being careful that videos of those sources have some way of proving their validity because obviously they can also just be spreading lies.

And, there is an incentive to lie about beliefs. If you get them in, control them, and prevent them from viewing and trusting outside, opposing sources, you can make them believe what you want about the organisation without showing them the bad. Then you can get money, free labour and free sales people promoting your "product". Those in a religion but will not even watch a video with an opposing view proves my point about how they can be controlled by a group once they are in it. If a person will not look at opposing sources to their view that is pretty much a warning sign in itself that they fear what is said and are part of a cult group. Since all they have to do is refute what is said which settles the issue.

Also, if you can get a person into a group through telling lies, but preventing them from leaving the group under duress, then that is one benefit of lying. If someone is in a group, gets married to a member in a group, has children, and then can't leave because their family will disown them if they do, in which they will never see their family again, then that is a perfect way of keeping a person in a group, even if they discover they were lied to.

You will only be able to make up your own mind if you have all the facts.
 

Shadow Rose

Member
I believe that all religions, in some way, have truth to them. Once you become part of a religion you will be biased towards that religion and those beliefs and believe that your religion is the one true faith. Many religions came about by someone not agreeing fully with the religion that they were currently in and so they took their beliefs and created a new religion adding to it with their own beliefs. Does it make this new religion wrong? No, because there are still some truths that have followed to this new religion.

I was raised as a Christian for all my life until I started questioning so many things. I started my research and have found a place with Hinduism that feels more at home. Even though I no longer follow the Christian faith I do still find some truth in it. I do admit though that the JW beliefs are a little hard to swallow but who am I to say that they are wrong?
 

Neutral Name

Active Member
.


Thoughts?

.


What a can of worms that is for me. I was a Christian until I realized that each denomination was right and, to each, the others were wrong. So, the body of Christ was divided into thousands of denominations. Instead of following what Jesus said, to love each other and come together, they have divided. A house divided cannot stand, Matthew 12:25-28. So, to me, the Jehovah's Witnesses are just another misguided denomination.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
What a can of worms that is for me. I was a Christian until I realized that each denomination was right and, to each, the others were wrong. So, the body of Christ was divided into thousands of denominations. Instead of following what Jesus said, to love each other and come together, they have divided. A house divided cannot stand, Matthew 12:25-28. So, to me, the Jehovah's Witnesses are just another misguided denomination.
That they are.

.
 

Mister Emu

Emu Extraordinaire
Staff member
Premium Member
How is it shocking that Jehova's Witnesses believe they have the true faith or that their Bible is correct?
 
Top