• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Tree of Knowledge

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
the ''golden rule'' is a hoax.

i want to eat the fruit, but i don't want a wolf to eat me. where is this ''golden rule''?


the fruit is what one produces. it isn't what goes in the body that defiles someone. it's what comes out of the heart.

Matthew 7:12
12 In everything, treat others as you would want them to treat you, for this fulfills the law and the prophets.

the golden rule doesn't say do unto self what others would do unto you.
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
So that when Adam and Eve ate of it's fruit, they "took into themselves" (ingested) the belief that they possessed the right and the ability to pass judgment on all Creation, as if they were God's equals.
Given that Adam's job was to name animals, God already set up the idea that man was to have dominion over creation. God already delegated and doesn't get to whine about it later.

What they deemed "good" was whatever complied with their own desires. And what they deemed "evil" was whatever stood in the way of their desires.
Yes. It's curious that the first thing they do is start making up sins that no one ever mentioned before. And then their descendants made religion, codifying all these sins that are frequently out of touch with any semblance of reality.

A good tree doesn't bear bad fruit.
Even good trees have rotten fruit if the fruit just stays on the tree to rot. :p

The serpent came and offered a new way that would bypass the tree of Life and even bypass God; making mankind equal with God so that mankind would apparently no longer need any tree of Life.
It's amazing that godhood can be obtained by a change of diet.

So that we are self sufficient and unneedful of God or anything God has to offer.
Has it ever occurred to you that God was once just someone who ate this magic fruit?

17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
Maybe it got infected or something, though, which isn't the tree's fault. :)
 

74x12

Well-Known Member
Has it ever occurred to you that God was once just someone who ate this magic fruit?
No because God made the tree ... besides it was only the serpent's lie that it was able to make them as gods. The truth was it could not do that. This serpent is obviously the same being that first said in his own heart that he would "ascend" and be "like(equal) the Most High". So, having failed miserably to achieve this; he tempts the humans to cause them to come into the same failure as himself.
 

PureX

Veteran Member
Given that Adam's job was to name animals, God already set up the idea that man was to have dominion over creation. God already delegated and doesn't get to whine about it later.
How does God "whine about it later"? Also, dominion over" can mean a lot of things. It can mean anything from 'loving caretaker' to 'ruthless predator'. What it didn't mean, I don't believe, was 'co-creator', or 'existential judge'.
Yes. It's curious that the first thing they do is start making up sins that no one ever mentioned before. And then their descendants made religion, codifying all these sins that are frequently out of touch with any semblance of reality.
One of the things I find most fascinating about the story of Eden is that the religion that enshrined it is, as you've pointed out, the indemnification of the very "original sin" that the story illuminates: mankind's false and hubristic presumption to possess the knowledge of good and evil.
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
How does God "whine about it later"? Also, dominion over" can mean a lot of things. It can mean anything from 'loving caretaker' to 'ruthless predator'. What it didn't mean, I don't believe, was 'co-creator', or 'existential judge'.
One of the things I find most fascinating about the story of Eden is that the religion that enshrined it is, as you've pointed out, the indemnification of the very "original sin" that the story illuminates: mankind's false and hubristic presumption to possess the knowledge of good and evil.


You what's more amazing, is that people think what happened in the garden of Eden, was where the original sin happen. Now that's amazing.
The original sin happen long before Adam and Eve and the garden of Eden came to be.
 

PureX

Veteran Member
You what's more amazing, is that people think what happened in the garden of Eden, was where the original sin happen. Now that's amazing.
The original sin happen long before Adam and Eve and the garden of Eden came to be.
Well, it is a story, after all. A story about human nature. And about why can't/don't live in harmony with our environment.
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
besides it was only the serpent's lie that it was able to make them as gods
No, because God verifies this was the actual reason He didn't want them to eat it. Is God lying?

How does God "whine about it later"?
God: So, do stuff.
Humans: *do stuff*
God: I WILL PUNISH YOU FOR DARING TO THINK YOU CAN DO STUFF!

(See Tower of Babel for starters and then progress to pretty much most stories in the bible where humans are trying to dominate like God told us to do.)
 

74x12

Well-Known Member
No, because God verifies this was the actual reason He didn't want them to eat it. Is God lying?
No... it's just that it wouldn't make them as gods like Eve thought. It would only make them as God in this one way that they would know good and evil. So, the serpent's deception was subtle but it is still deception.
 
Top