Faithofchristian
Well-Known Member
Can a tree be inherently good or evil? Is knowledge inherently good and evil?
Can you explain, As to Who those two trees of good and evil Represented ?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Can a tree be inherently good or evil? Is knowledge inherently good and evil?
the ''golden rule'' is a hoax.what is within the golden rule, what is without?
do more/less unto others as you would for self? or do unto others as self?
allegory, metaphorical, figurativelyAs much as the rocks in my driveway.
As much as the rocks in my driveway.
And what does any of this have to do with religion?
.
.
the ''golden rule'' is a hoax.
i want to eat the fruit, but i don't want a wolf to eat me. where is this ''golden rule''?
Can you explain, As to Who those two trees of good and evil Represented ?
Given that Adam's job was to name animals, God already set up the idea that man was to have dominion over creation. God already delegated and doesn't get to whine about it later.So that when Adam and Eve ate of it's fruit, they "took into themselves" (ingested) the belief that they possessed the right and the ability to pass judgment on all Creation, as if they were God's equals.
Yes. It's curious that the first thing they do is start making up sins that no one ever mentioned before. And then their descendants made religion, codifying all these sins that are frequently out of touch with any semblance of reality.What they deemed "good" was whatever complied with their own desires. And what they deemed "evil" was whatever stood in the way of their desires.
Even good trees have rotten fruit if the fruit just stays on the tree to rot.A good tree doesn't bear bad fruit.
It's amazing that godhood can be obtained by a change of diet.The serpent came and offered a new way that would bypass the tree of Life and even bypass God; making mankind equal with God so that mankind would apparently no longer need any tree of Life.
Has it ever occurred to you that God was once just someone who ate this magic fruit?So that we are self sufficient and unneedful of God or anything God has to offer.
Maybe it got infected or something, though, which isn't the tree's fault.17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
No because God made the tree ... besides it was only the serpent's lie that it was able to make them as gods. The truth was it could not do that. This serpent is obviously the same being that first said in his own heart that he would "ascend" and be "like(equal) the Most High". So, having failed miserably to achieve this; he tempts the humans to cause them to come into the same failure as himself.Has it ever occurred to you that God was once just someone who ate this magic fruit?
How does God "whine about it later"? Also, dominion over" can mean a lot of things. It can mean anything from 'loving caretaker' to 'ruthless predator'. What it didn't mean, I don't believe, was 'co-creator', or 'existential judge'.Given that Adam's job was to name animals, God already set up the idea that man was to have dominion over creation. God already delegated and doesn't get to whine about it later.
One of the things I find most fascinating about the story of Eden is that the religion that enshrined it is, as you've pointed out, the indemnification of the very "original sin" that the story illuminates: mankind's false and hubristic presumption to possess the knowledge of good and evil.Yes. It's curious that the first thing they do is start making up sins that no one ever mentioned before. And then their descendants made religion, codifying all these sins that are frequently out of touch with any semblance of reality.
How does God "whine about it later"? Also, dominion over" can mean a lot of things. It can mean anything from 'loving caretaker' to 'ruthless predator'. What it didn't mean, I don't believe, was 'co-creator', or 'existential judge'.
One of the things I find most fascinating about the story of Eden is that the religion that enshrined it is, as you've pointed out, the indemnification of the very "original sin" that the story illuminates: mankind's false and hubristic presumption to possess the knowledge of good and evil.
Well, it is a story, after all. A story about human nature. And about why can't/don't live in harmony with our environment.You what's more amazing, is that people think what happened in the garden of Eden, was where the original sin happen. Now that's amazing.
The original sin happen long before Adam and Eve and the garden of Eden came to be.
No, because God verifies this was the actual reason He didn't want them to eat it. Is God lying?besides it was only the serpent's lie that it was able to make them as gods
God: So, do stuff.How does God "whine about it later"?
The devil is war.
Surely with passion we are entitled to the occasional war..
(not the current style of war over nothing and fabricated means but of cause)
Imo, passion is the same as love and the opposite of war.
No... it's just that it wouldn't make them as gods like Eve thought. It would only make them as God in this one way that they would know good and evil. So, the serpent's deception was subtle but it is still deception.No, because God verifies this was the actual reason He didn't want them to eat it. Is God lying?
yes, and some love is greater for a cause then the whole of people.
There are two reasons a God (Love) doesn't fight; compassion and his might.