It is 100% correct.it is not 100% rule, but technically it is correct.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It is 100% correct.it is not 100% rule, but technically it is correct.
God did not appoint me to be wise.if God appointed you to be wise, how can you not to be?
but you still 100 % correct...God did not appoint me to be wise.
I am always 100% correct on anything that I say to you.but you still 100 % correct...
stay correct...I am always 100% correct on anything that I say to you.
Reminds me of most politicians. Blowing a lot of hot air but saying nothing.I am always 100% correct on anything that I say to you.
Thank you. I will take it as a complement.You remind me of the devil.
By the way, personal attacks are not allowed and may get you banned from the site after only a few days. So take your medicine and maybe you will feel better after a nap.Thank you. I will take it as a complement.
Fine, but nowhere does the NT call Jesus "God". Which is what this thread is really about.
Jesus excluded himself from the Godhead when he called the Father "You, the only true God".
I'll go on citing that scripture - John 17:3 - until people understand that it indeed excludes Jesus from being God.
The Word was with God and the Word was God. Sure sounds like two separate "beings" are called "God". You can argue over their names but you cannot say only one is God because the Bible says both are "God".
The Word became flesh. Not the Word took on flesh. The Word dwelt among us. Not the plan dwelt among us. If God took on fles, as Jesus, why would he pray to himself? And why would he say the Father was greater than himself. What most people call God is actually a family consisting of a father and a son. Both are part of this one family or one God. Just like if there is a family called Jones that consists of several people. They are still one family. There is only one God (family) but more than one person in that family. And the good news is that you and I can become part of that family because God wants to adopt us into his family and we will inherit all the thing Jesus is set to inherit.On the surface it might sound like it, but that can't be correct, because it is in conflict with all the verses that say there is only one God. The Greek word logos means the plan (or thought or concept or idea). What that verse is actually telling us is that In the beginning was the plan, and the plan was with God, and the plan was God. He had it all planned out that he would take on flesh, and when the proper time came for his plan to unfold, he did it.
There is only one God. John 4:24 says God is a Spirit. That one and only God took on flesh. So there aren't two that are both God.
It confuses people because that flesh was weak, and would pray to the Spirit. They think that means there were two persons. But it is really just the flesh crying out to the eternal Spirit for strength.
The Word became flesh. Not the Word took on flesh. The Word dwelt among us. Not the plan dwelt among us. If God took on fles, as Jesus, why would he pray to himself? And why would he say the Father was greater than himself. What most people call God is actually a family consisting of a father and a son. Both are part of this one family or one God. Just like if there is a family called Jones that consists of several people. They are still one family. There is only one God (family) but more than one person in that family. And the good news is that you and I can become part of that family because God wants to adopt us into his family and we will inherit all the thing Jesus is set to inherit.
And your idea of a "plan" taking on flesh makes no sense. I see you did not answer the question about why this fleshy "plan" would pray to someone it called "father". Probably because that also makes no sense. And of course you can believe what you want, but it is not in the Bible either.When the time was right, the plan became a reality, and he took on flesh and dwelt among us. The Father was greater, because the Spirit is greater than the flesh. You can believe whatever you want, but your family ideas are unsupported by scripture.
And your idea of a "plan" taking on flesh makes no sense. I see you did not answer the question about why this fleshy "plan" would pray to someone it called "father". Probably because that also makes no sense. And of course you can believe what you want, but it is not in the Bible either.
I do not see any Bible verses to support this. However, John 1:12 says he gave people the power to become the sons of God. Many sons. Like a family. If YHWH was in a fleshy body then YHWH must be the same as the Word because the Word was made flesh. And the Word was with God so something can't be with something else unless there are two things. Therefore YHWH cannot be the Word and YHWH could not be the one that became flesh because the Word became flesh. I will be glad to read any verse that says YHWH became flesh but you are short on listing verses that support your view.Read my post 191 again for the answer. Now you tell me, if he was God as you say, why did he have to pray to anyone to begin with?
I am saying the Messiah was YHWH dwelling in a fleshly body. The flesh was called the Son and would pray to the Spirit (the Father) dwelling in him for strength.
That also provides an explanation for why he would say things like:
I and my Father are one.
If you have seen me you have seen the Father
Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.
But now have they both seen and hated both me and my Father.
No man knows who the Father is but the Son, and no man knows who the Son is but the Father, and he to whomsoever he chooses to reveal him.
I do not see any Bible verses to support this. However, John 1:12 says he gave people the power to become the sons of God. Many sons. Like a family. If YHWH was in a fleshy body then YHWH must be the same as the Word because the Word was made flesh. And the Word was with God so something can't be with something else unless there are two things. Therefore YHWH cannot be the Word and YHWH could not be the one that became flesh because the Word became flesh. I will be glad to read any verse that says YHWH became flesh but you are short on listing verses that support your view.
If he was God, why did he have to pray to anyone? He was a son praying to his Father. Again, a father and a son is two people but they are both part of one family. The son in the God family was praying to the father in the God family. And in John 1:3 when it says all things were made by "him" it is referring to the Word because the Word is the subject of John 1:1-2. And the one who shed his blod was Jesus ( the son) not the Father. So again this is two persons.I noticed you didn't answer my question. If he was God why did he need to pray to anyone?
Genesis 1:1 God created the heavens and the earth
Isaiah 44:24 YHWH said he created all things. He said he was alone and by himself.
Colossians 1:14-18 According to these verses all things were created by the one who shed the blood. So it is easy to see the Messiah also had to be YHWH.
Isaiah 40:3 A voice in the wilderness - Prepare ye the way of YHWH
Luke 3:2-4 John the baptist turns out to be that voice. I ask you - Who did John prepare the way for? Once again it is easy to see the Messiah had to be YHWH.
I do not see any Bible verses to support this. However, John 1:12 says he gave people the power to become the sons of God. Many sons. Like a family. If YHWH was in a fleshy body then YHWH must be the same as the Word because the Word was made flesh. And the Word was with God so something can't be with something else unless there are two things. Therefore YHWH cannot be the Word and YHWH could not be the one that became flesh because the Word became flesh. I will be glad to read any verse that says YHWH became flesh but you are short on listing verses that support your view.
If he was God, why did he have to pray to anyone? He was a son praying to his Father. Again, a father and a son is two people but they are both part of one family. The son in the God family was praying to the father in the God family. And in John 1:3 when it says all things were made by "him" it is referring to the Word because the Word is the subject of John 1:1-2. And the one who shed his blod was Jesus ( the son) not the Father. So again this is two persons.