Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Wakka wakka, but seriously. Do you, in your honest opinion, believe that Trump has handled himself rationally thus far?Obviously they didn't, so, thankfully, Hillary is still living in NY instead of DC.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Wakka wakka, but seriously. Do you, in your honest opinion, believe that Trump has handled himself rationally thus far?Obviously they didn't, so, thankfully, Hillary is still living in NY instead of DC.
Did Trump finally admit that he fired Comey because of his frustration with the Russia investigation? And, did he also admit that he thought firing Comey would relieve the pressure from the investigation?
I admit, I am hesitant to even think Trump would be that dumb. But, the recent alleged statement from Trump and Spicey's almost confirmation of that comment seem to back it up.
From Trump hit by twin Russia bombshells as he departs for foreign trip
“I just fired the head of the FBI. He was crazy, a real nut job,” Trump said, according to the Times. “I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”
White House press secretary Sean Spicer offered a statement that did not dispute Trump’s quotes and instead presented them as the president talking frankly about the “pressure” Comey had put on Trump’s diplomatic responsibilities.
He also attacked the leaks coming out of the U.S. government.
"The President has always emphasized the importance of making deals with Russia as it relates to Syria, Ukraine, defeating ISIS and other key issues for the benefit and safety of the American people. By grandstanding and politicizing the investigation into Russia's actions, James Comey created unnecessary pressure on our ability to engage and negotiate with Russia,” Spicer said in the statement.
PLEASE DON'T RESORT TO CALLING POLITICO OR THE NYT "FAKE NEWS" AS YOUR ARGUMENT (WE ARE BETTER THAN THAT). IF YOU THINK IT IS A COMPLETELY FABRICATED STORY, PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY AND EXPLAIN SPICER'S COMMENT ABOUT IT. THANK YOU.
Trump's not a liar in my book.
https://video.search.yahoo.com/sear...1b208234c4933cde4daa19960c13d111&action=clickIn your book, 9/11 was an inside job. The pages of such a book should be printed on soft, absorbent two-ply.
A few videos in that playlist already addressed that.The picture doesn't lie..Tell me how that building fell down like a perfect demolition.
A few videos in that playlist already addressed that.
Uncle Heathen doesn't really have the time nor the inclination at the moment to set you on his knee and spoon feed you.Go ahead and say it. Or does it take too long to weave the tale?
Then I'll make it clear, if it looks like a demolition, it probably is a demolition.Uncle Heathen doesn't really have the time nor the inclination at the moment to set you on his knee and spoon feed you.
Maybe flying a plane into a skyscraper also looks like a demolition. If appearances are all you're going on, then how do you control for the possibility that one method of destruction might look similar to another method of destruction?Then I'll make it clear, if it looks like a demolition, it probably is a demolition.
*sigh* Again, a few of the videos in that playlist already address this, but since you choose to wallow in willful ignorance, I'll present one here:Then I'll make it clear, if it looks like a demolition, it probably is a demolition.
I'm sorry, but the possible collusion of our President with Russia is kinda important.I'm sure Trump thought Comey should keep quiet about an investigation that doesn't have any evidence yet to talk about. Even if they do have evidence, Comey should keep quiet until the Department of Justice decides to do something about it. The talk about Russia is using up valuable journalistic time to talk about his achievements which they don't seem to want to talk about.
I think he did, but who knows maybe it was just locker room talk.
I'm sorry, but the possible collusion of our President with Russia is kinda important.
I don't get Trump supporters. They talked about Benghazi and emails for years, but a couple months of talking about possible treason by our actual President, and they are already bored.
Im also not really sure what achievements we should be talking about. Yes, he nominated a reasonable SC Justice, and McConnell made sure he got approved. Otherwise... what is there? His travel bans have been a PR and legal nightmare. His healthcare and tax initiatives are looking crappy and not going very far. What am I missing?
I don't think it's "fake news," but merely repeating what amounts to rumor and speculation doesn't really give us anything solid to go on.
Frankly, I think this is the case because so many of them think they're getting "news" from the likes of Fox, Limbaugh, Breitbart, etc.I don't get Trump supporters. They talked about Benghazi and emails for years, but a couple months of talking about possible treason by our actual President, and they are already bored.
Maybe flying a plane into a skyscraper also looks like a demolition. If appearances are all you're going on, then how do you control for the possibility that one method of destruction might look similar to another method of destruction?
That's really not true as both Democrats and an increasing number of Republicans do agree that there's sufficient reason to suspect Russian collusion by members of this administration, but the big questions are whom and how much?However, I do know that most people who watch the MSM are getting a mindful of Russian stories without any evidence to support those stories.
That's really not true as both Democrats and an increasing number of Republicans do agree that there's sufficient reason to suspect Russian collusion by members of this administration, but the big questions are whom and how much?