Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, we need President Palmer....The last one. Dear God!
Can we have Frank Underwood for President? I mean How much more damage could he do in the Oval Office?
No, we need President Palmer....
Still better than Trump or Hilda!Didn't he die?
Likewise, I don't see Trump pulling punches as we witnessed with Rya and Romney. This debate cycle should be freakin' hilarious.
I wouldn't be surprised if Don Trump holds "the trump cards"..Trump on the stage with Clinton..
Still better than Trump or Hilda!
Haha awesome, you're on!In 2012, the third presidential debate took place around the 3rd week of October.
I have set my phone calendar to check this thread and comment on October 21st, 2016. I suggest you do the same.
I will go to realclearpolitics.com and post the most recent polling data on this thread.
I will be prepared to gloat or eat crow. Considering the absolute nightmare of Trump as a general election candidate vs a candidate of substance, I'm prepared to gloat on that day.
See ya then!
Eh... I wouldn't be so sure.
Remember that Trump just bulldozed through 16 other candidates, including senators and governors, many of whom were very similar to Clinton in rhetoric and style, the traditional politician.
Perhaps his debating style won't play well with a general election audience, we shall see. What was key though was how Trump could take over a debate and make the other candidate look weak and incompetent, speaking over them and leaving them speechless without a comeback. (Poor Jeb, he became a stuttering mess)
If Trump has the same effect on Hillary, that won't be good news for her.
People vote with their hearts not with their reason. In the end of the day people will ask themselves the question: Who would I like to drink a pint of beer with. Who is most fun. Sorry, Hillary is too powerful for most men and women to feel comfortable with. She would however be an extremely powerful leader. I think Russia and China will gladly opt for Trump.Good analysis. But I'm still not worried about Clinton's ability to beat Trump in the debates. What I'm worried a little bit about is that so many people (justifiably) think Clinton can run circles around Trump that if she beats him anything less than decisively, it will be viewed as a Trump victory. He's the underdog, and ironically, that means he can win points just for hanging in there.
I think Russia and China will gladly opt for Trump.
Don't be silly the US controls the world economy by a large margin. For instance 80% of China's export is really from American corporations. Russia's economy is something like Italy.up. They'd love to see us fall behind them, and Trump will further that goal consid
Don't be silly the US controls the world economy by a large margin. For instance 80% of China's export is really from American corporations. Russia's economy is something like Italy.
Hillary would be a very tough negotiator with China and Russia, but I doubt if that is what we need right now. A little less confrontational politics might be better, especially as things in the Middle East are totally spinning out of control. Suddenly the US is glad that Putin is willing to lend them a hand.
The only thing I find worrying about Trump is his viewpoints om climate change. But then again, Trump can change his viewpoints in a minute, he is not ideological driven.
Don't be silly the US controls the world economy by a large margin. For instance 80% of China's export is really from American corporations. Russia's economy is something like Italy.
Hillary would be a very tough negotiator with China and Russia, but I doubt if that is what we need right now. A little less confrontational politics might be better, especially as things in the Middle East are totally spinning out of control. Suddenly the US is glad that Putin is willing to lend them a hand.
The only thing I find worrying about Trump is his viewpoints om climate change. But then again, Trump can change his viewpoints in a minute, he is not ideological driven.
If you had better facts, you would not talk in one-liners.Don't trouble yourself with the facts!!!!
Nobody in America cares about such finesses in presidential elections. It is also based on an outdated thinking that China and Russia are the ideological enemy. That kind of ideological split no longer exists. In todays world all mayor countries work together to keep the world economy and ecology from crashing. Sure countries compete, but for the US Russia or China is no bigger competitor than Europe.Interesting analysis, but you've missed the mark. At issue is not whether a Trump presidency would allow China or Russia to actually overtake us, but whether a Trump presidency would help that along more than a Clinton presidency. Try again.
Says the guy who supports a war mongering, sexist, sexual assault enabling, incompetent, corrupt, power hungry, crony capitalist.You know, we eventually came to believe that religious bigotry, racism, bullying innocent people, making fun of those who may have handicaps, etc. were just plain wrong, but with Trump's increasing popularity, it's obvious that we are now sinking into moral bankruptcy and are willing to throw a societal temper-tantrum much on the same level of a two-year old. Just remember that in the 1930's, the Japanese, the Italians, and the Germans wanted change too, and remember what that brought them and much of the rest of the world. IOW, be careful what you wish for. I'm no Hillary fan, but I'll be damned if I'd be so reckless so as to vote for Trump.