• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump Found Guilty

F1fan

Veteran Member
Maybe you should investage more before you make such statments.
From: Biden won't be charged in classified docs case; special counsel cites instances of 'poor memory'
WASHINGTON — Special counsel Robert Hur has declined to prosecute President Joe Biden for his handling of classified documents but said in a report released Thursday that Biden’s practices “present serious risks to national security” and added that part of the reason he wouldn't charge Biden was that the president could portray himself as an "elderly man with a poor memory" who would be sympathetic to a jury.

Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,” the report said, but added that the evidence “does not establish Mr. Biden’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”



It would be up to an Grand Jury to determine if it was beyond a reasonable doubt.
But it is up to prosecutors to present a case to a grand jury.

So do you think both Biden and Trump should be tried on having documents? Trump will also face obstruction charges since he deliberately lied about documents, and hid them. Biden cooperated.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
When the tea party formed back in the Obama years it brought out a lot of hidden racists that no one knew were there. It was explained that many of these folks didn't realize they were racist until a black president was elected, and they triggered. The same seems to affect otherwise sane people. Bill Barr was highly critical of Trump after the events of Jan 6, but has recently ignored that by supporting Trump for election again. He seems to have deep motivations that has bubbled up over his capacity for reason. This is the danger of emotional people whose biases align to right wing politics. They see the due process being a threat to Trump, and by proxy to themselves.

I don't see any Trump supporters being rational actors. The exception would be the wealthy who know they can personally benefit financally by supporting Trump. Of course they are indifferent to fallout of Trump as president, and the corruption that will follow.

It could be that this writer has been overcome by the verdict, which can be interpreted as a conviction against republicans. It's all quite sybolic, and the meanings can be deeply rooted in peoples minds and beliefs. It is difficult to manage the emotional response to events that are not prepared for.
That era also brought out racists who favored Obama
simply because he's black. Also, to merely disagree
with Obama brought charges of racism. (Happened
to me here on RF).
I knew many Tea Party types. Most just loathed the
direction government was taking us.
 
Top