Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The election results shows that Trump has won the electoral votes he will become President. He has also won the popular vote. In addition the Republicans have gained control of the Senate. So the question for the poll is, "Does Trump have a mandate?"
I am not defining it. Each respondent is free to define the term for himself.Well, it appears he has won the electoral votes, so he will become President, along with the Constitutional powers and authority granted to that office.
But when you say "mandate," what does that mean? A mandate to do what?
Making the question meaningless.I am not defining it. Each respondent is free to define the term for himself.
Au contraire, it makes it either meaningful or meaningless solely based on what mandate means to you.Making the question meaningless.
So you are saying that a democratic majority of votes doesn't define a mandate.No, he has the trust of the majority of the electorate.
So you are saying that a democratic majority of votes doesn't define a mandate.
A mandate to do what? A mandate to ignore and disregard the people that did not vote for him?The election results shows that Trump has won the electoral votes he will become President. He has also won the popular vote. In addition the Republicans have gained control of the Senate. So the question for the poll is, "Does Trump have a mandate?"
So you are saying that a democratic majority of votes doesn't define a mandate.
Sorry, we don't have those. Though it sounds like a good idea.In the U.K. an elected government is considered to have a mandate to do whatever is in their published manifesto. Do presidential candidates have written manifestos? If not, presumably they can still argue that they have a mandate to do the things they said they’d do; which in Trump’s case leaves him free to try to undermine the legal institutions of his country.
Wrong, because the "X" could be an abstract, such as the abstraction of being President.I know you're trying to be clever, but there is no such thing as a mandate in the abstract. Rather, there is a mandate to do "X" - whatever "X" might be.