Audie
Veteran Member
I did say nuance, if that’s a difference.But there really isn't much subtlety in most of what he says. I've always said that I don't need news pundits, MAGA apologists or even left wing opponents to make a judgement. Just his own words out of his own mouth.
You're right about religion, and I've been thinking the same thing. This "interpretation" of what he says by his supporters has a familiar ring. It makes me think of a discussion where a skeptic quotes the Bible about (say) slavery. That's bad, says the skeptic, and the Bible is very plain on the subject. Well no, replies the apologist, it doesn't really mean slavery as we understand it, more like indentured servitude. And on it goes. It's what I call GCL (God Can't Lose). No matter what, the Bible is always interpreted to put God in a good light. I see the same pattern with Trump supporters. Trump can't lose in their eyes, and anything he says that seems bad must have some hidden meaning that is good.
My reference to bible- interpretin’ was actually for those
who read fascist nazi misogynist dictator racist etc and
wildveyed blah into his speech.
However for Evangelicals- their readings
are what they are
Unless democrat = atheist, they too
have their own infallible bible readings.
Who can claim the title of unbiased reader?
Regardless, I think my simple reading that
his intent is to screen applicants for entry
on the basis, first, if they are enemies.
which imo, and that ofall my friends and relatives who
moved to the US, is right and proper- and that
open border is a danger to,the USA. And insane.
No graduate degree from U of Hong Kong needed
to detect that.
A tested and proven idiotic policy, v one that is the
most basic good sense, though it can be misread
and hyped into fascist christian - only racidt
fascism?
Last edited: