@Subduction Zone,
@Shadow Wolf,
@skeptic Thinker,
@9-10ths_Penguin,
@metis, @blindKH supporters and
@F1fan who claimed Kamala speaks clearly and who didn't respond after listening to her chant.
Did you figure out what she was saying? Check the video again on page 3 post#44
View attachment 99529
What do you think this is?
Here are the possible answers...
1. Zee
2. Zed
3. Ezed/ Izzard (obsolete)
Every time I come back here - I smell maple trees! I smell zed instead of zee! Why is that?
How many of you are Canadians? I know Shadow Wolf is American - but how about the rest of you?
If you are Canadian - then you should keep you opinions for your fellow countrymen!
Your foreign interference is not required and not welcome!
However keep in mind that - there is a good chance - Trump will treat Canada better this time! Canadians can take a chill pill and relax! Chill pill should be readily available out there up north - no?
Well, at least this medicine just hit the market
- take in moderation!
View attachment 99530
@Shadow Wolf
You will soon realize you were just having a nightmare and all your concerns were not real. But it may take you about six month to wake up from your sleep.
Wait for it!
Wait for it!
Wait for it!
. They are asked to release the unedited version. If they don't then there always could be a whistle blower!
Do you agree that It is very easy for CBS to release the unedited version of the tape and make Trump look really bad to his supporters! Right? It would have been the best gift they could have given to Kamala. But they refuse to release it. Go figure!
Is truth + truth=false... or is 2+2=4?
Who are they protecting by not releasing the unedited tape?
1.Are they protecting themselves? Because maybe they did what they are accused of?
2. Are they protecting Kamala? Because she did f**k up and and they are damage controlling on her behalf?
Or
3. Are they protecting Trump from making a fool of himself?
It is not number 3 for sure! Don cha think?
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out 2+2 =4
A real unedited tape would be just a longer version of the same tape and very easy to show nothing out of the ordinary took place there. An unedited tape may have some innocent bloopers where the candidate would face the camera and begin taping again after they innocently took a break or stopped due to simple technical glitch. But time stamp will match even if they cut here and there!
But a fraudulence version would be where you can clearly see the time stamp when the question was asked - is different than the time stamp of when the answer was given. For example the question was asked at 5 minute mark and there are other answers and then an answer from 17 minute mark was edited into 5:14 minute mark and right after the the question. It is very easy to show discrepancy if any.
If altered time stamp is found in its digital format
then that would not be an example of simple editing. This wasn't a movie - they were shooting.
An interview should be authentic.
Nuff said!
But maybe not enough for you
You are a late comer to the conversation. If Trump wins then no damage is done! So relax and hope Trump wins! Oh I see - you are not rooting for Trump - you are not for the 'Trump card' - you are not rooting for
triumph for trump!
Are you seriously asking this question about a guy who is about to be the 47 President?
How low can you go?
Let me ask you a counter question:
Are you sad Trump survived his assassination attempts?
I hope my counter question shows you - how stupid your question was!
If you realize it - I hope you never ask people such stupid question again.
