• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump Supporter Berates Chelsea Clinton and Her Children

esmith

Veteran Member
That's part of your problem. You create threads which aren't worth making. Making threads isn't something you do to pass time. I'm just surprised a libertarian like you decided to not support a libertarian candidate for president.
Only in your eyes sonny. I stopped supporting the libertarian candidate this year due to his stance on a subject best left unsaid.
I now consider myself a Realist.
You know what a realist is don't you?

How will a libertarian ever win if they can't convince their 'faux' supporters to do the right thing and support their party?
I've said it many times, libertarians are republicans. But the past decade the republican party has created this libertarian front to support their positions further. It's like the 'cool' thing to do. Call yourself a libertarian and not a republican. But vote republican in the end.
No principles.
You know at my age and position in life it really doesn't matter which party is in control as long as they don't directly affect me and neither party will make any changes that will adversely affect my financial situation. That is unless the far far left, you know the current flock of sheeples that have no idea what the real world is like and think you can get something for nothing and the world owns them somehow manges to put their policies into affect.
As far as this post goes I thought it might just make some stop and think. But obviously I see I was wrong when it comes to you and probably others. Some are so blinded by their utter dislike of someone or something they disagree with that they can't see the other side of the coin.
So I welcome you continued rhetoric against something you can't understand because at times we all need comic relief. So continue to post, every once in awhile you make a coherent statement that is worth my time and effort to reply to.
 

esmith

Veteran Member
I thought CNN's coverage of this was fair. Do you have any complaints in how they covered it?
Do you have any complaints in how they covered it?
No.
And here is how TYT covered it.
Never heard of TYT, but at least they had a true statement.



I will say that although I think Ivanka is fair game as she played a pivotal role in the campaign and it looks like she may play a part in the Trump administration, but I do think it is wrong to get into her face on a plane. That is just unfair, she bought her ticket, leave her alone. There is a time and a place for protest, and this is not it.
I won't argue the point about Ivanka but the same goes for Chelsea.
However, if you think it is acceptable to berate someone with their children present, who have no idea why some ******* is screaming at their mother, then maybe you had better step back and take a serious look at yourself.
 

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
However, if you think it is acceptable
The Republicans really lowered that bar during the campaign. After all the lies and fake stories they helped to spread about Clinton, they have no room to chide others. It's like the pot calling the china black.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
You know at my age and position in life it really doesn't matter which party is in control as long as they don't directly affect me and neither party will make any changes that will adversely affect my financial situation.
I am thankful for this statement because embodies everything that is wrong with modern day conservatives.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
The Republicans really lowered that bar during the campaign. After all the lies and fake stories they helped to spread about Clinton, they have no room to chide others. It's like the pot calling the china black.
But the most novel & unscrupulous thing to attack Hillary was publishing real information, eg,
her surreptitiously getting the debate questions in advance, the DNC plotting against Bernie.
That was really hitting below the ceinture.
 

Scuba Pete

Le plongeur avec attitude...
But the most novel & unscrupulous thing to attack Hillary was publishing real information, eg,
her surreptitiously getting the debate questions in advance, the DNC plotting against Bernie.
That was really hitting below the ceinture.
Yeah, that was about the worst TRUE thing they came up with. The incessant character assassinations, with allusions to her being a liar far eclipsed any true criticisms they might have had. Chanting "Jail her" and so forth really set the tone for Trump's campaign based on hate, intolerance and lies. Take away those unfair distortions and her lies are minuscule compared to Trump's.

But I get it. You have to justify being duped by the used car salesman you call president. You've got to carry it forth until it's no longer sustainable. I bet within the year that you'll be crying the blues.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I bet within the year that you'll be crying the blues.
How could I possibly be upset with the result?
Hillary lost.
That was my singular goal.
It's too bad that Trump's win was necessary to achieve that, but as they say.....
Qapla'!
 
Last edited:

esmith

Veteran Member
The Republicans really lowered that bar during the campaign. After all the lies and fake stories they helped to spread about Clinton, they have no room to chide others. It's like the pot calling the china black.
Does that give someone to berate a mother and her children?
I suggest you take a real close look at yourself in the mirror if you think this is acceptable.
As far as fake stories not sure which ones you are referring to. Don't think they released the emails, nor did they set up Hillary's personal server, nor did they release the fact that she had a private server. Something tells me you have been reading or listening to the wrong sources.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Does that give someone to berate a mother and her children?
I suggest you take a real close look at yourself in the mirror if you think this is acceptable.
As far as fake stories not sure which ones you are referring to. Don't think they released the emails, nor did they set up Hillary's personal server, nor did they release the fact that she had a private server. Something tells me you have been reading or listening to the wrong sources.
What's so odd is that Hillary's camp is fine with fake news, so long as it was anti-Trump & pro-Hilda.
NPR (a government created & subsidized news source), had numerous pieces comparing Trump to
Hitler, quotations which were altered to demonize, & puff pieces to make Hillary look competent &
progressive....hiding her screw-ups, lack of real experience, corruption, hair trigger temper, & war lust.

But incivility is a tool the left, as many lefties on RF have openly advocated (even staffers). When they
disagree with someone's politics, one should not allow accept this quietly. The opposition must be
demeaned, decried as evil, & shouted down. Anything less is "appeasement".

Note:
I know many fine people who voted for Hillary, & wouldn't stoop to abusing other people.
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
What's so odd is that Hillary's camp is fine with fake news, so long as it was anti-Trump & pro-Hilda.
NPR, a government news source, had numerous pieces comparing Trump to Hitler, quotations which
were altered to demonize, & puff pieces to make Hillary look competent & progressive.
Your new years resolution should be to let the Hillary horse die because you have beaten it with anything you can find. Need I remind you the election was over a month and half ago?
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
But incivility is a tool the left, as many lefties on RF have openly advocated (even staffers). When they
disagree with someone's politics, one should not allow accept this quietly. The opposition must be
demeaned, decried as evil, & shouted down. Anything less is "appeasement".
Getting your thread closed still sting? ;)
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Your new years resolution should be to let the Hillary horse die because you have beaten it with anything you can find. Need I remind you the election was over a month and half ago?
I can understand the discomfort caused by voting for such a person, & having to continue hearing about her.
But try to understand that it's just so much fun to poke at her festering carcass.
I can't help meself!
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Getting your thread closed still sting? ;)
Was it closed?
(Since I'm prohibited from posting in that forum, I didn't check it much.)
Meh....it served its purpose.

Was it really locked down?
How about your anti-Trump voter thread?
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
I can understand the discomfort caused by voting for such a person, & having to continue hearing about her.
But try to understand that it's just so much fun to poke at her festering carcass.
I can't help meself!
At least you understand my struggle. Let's find someone we both can pick on.
 
Top