Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
NK isn't a threat to Hawaii or the west coast. I wouldn't be so paranoid.Guess you don't live in Hawaii or on the West Coast of the US.
So what are the problems in your area?
Hawaii and the West Coast are not going to be attacked by North Korea. Nor is Guam. Vaccines don't give people autism, and fluoridated drinking water is safe.
And there you have it, folks.Hawaii and the West Coast are not going to be attacked by North Korea. Nor is Guam. Vaccines don't give people autism, and fluoridated drinking water is safe.
OK. So you ARE in the problem area. My bad.I currently live in Compton California smart guy.
Another oracle. Wonder why Hawaii was so sensitive when the sirens blared. They should have listened to you.NK isn't a threat to Hawaii or the west coast. I wouldn't be so paranoid.
Boy are you ignoring the news - Canada, Mexico and Europe are in a trade war with the USA.Uhhh...there is no trade war; China blinked. So if your very first statement is specious then the rest of your post would sorta be in doubt. Wouldn't it?
The connies ignore all the evil that the pile of dung is doing with his tens of thousands of lies, manipulating industries in a way like China and Russia do and so forth. But the true believers won't waiver in their support and say "thank you, may I have another" as his politics cause them pain.Meanwhile, anti-trumpsters can only think of ad hominem attacks.
I suppose it's the case because promised issues themselves are being addressed and the libbies are incapable of actually doing that themselves.
People tend to get paranoid at times. That does not mean that their fears are justified. A little dab of reasoning will do wonders for you.Another oracle. Wonder why Hawaii was so sensitive when the sirens blared. They should have listened to you.
If ballistic missile tests were landing close to you or going over your head to who knows where it wouldn't concern you? Especially when said missiles can hold a nuclear warhead?People tend to get paranoid at times. That does not mean that their fears are justified. A little dab of reasoning will do wonders for you.
Not like China's a Bastion of loves and kisses. A lefty favorite.The connies ignore all the evil that the pile of dung is doing with his tens of thousands of lies, manipulating industries in a way like China and Russia do and so forth. But the true believers won't waiver in their support and say "thank you, may I have another" as his politics cause them pain.
No missile tests went near Hawaii, and I am merely brighter than most. Too bad that you could not follow my advice, it implies that you might belong to the two groups you falsely claimed that I was in.If ballistic missile tests were landing close to you or going over your head to who knows where it wouldn't concern you? Especially when said missiles can hold a nuclear warhead?
You're either dumb or braver than most.
OK. I'll give it to you. Let's just change the threat to the UK and Alaska.No missile tests went near Hawaii, and I am merely brighter than most. Too bad that you could not follow my advice, it implies that you might belong to the two groups you falsely claimed that I was in.
You do not seem to realize that just because they could send their missiles this far that does not make them a "threat". Once again try to use a little thought. What could they gain? What could they lose? We have no interest in invading North Korea right now. They are too far away and too close to China if we do invade. China is a possible threat to North Korea, but now that they have nukes which could reach anywhere in China with no problem they are not to look at them in the same way that they looked at Tibet and later even Vietnam:OK. I'll give it to you. Let's just change the threat to the UK and Alaska.
Could North Korea bomb Hawaii? How far away is Hawaii from North Korea?
Not a threat? To who? Us? SK? Japan? Allies?You do not seem to realize that just because they could send their missiles this far that does not make them a "threat". Once again try to use a little thought. What could they gain? What could they lose? We have no interest in invading North Korea right now. They are too far away and too close to China if we do invade. China is a possible threat to North Korea, but now that they have nukes which could reach anywhere in China with no problem they are not to look at them in the same way that they looked at Tibet and later even Vietnam:
Sino-Vietnamese War - Wikipedia
China does not have much to gain by invading North Korea and thanks to their nuclear arms they have a lot to lose. The rattling of their swords against us, where we would easily nuke the country to submission if they tried anything, was merely distraction. Now that they have weapons that work and there is no need to test them any longer they are "willing to go into talks".
Why do think that NK is a threat to Hapan? Once again, having the ability is not a "threat". By your logic all Americans should be disarmed since they are a "threat" to their neighbors. It is not even much of threat to SK because they know that their would be massive retaliation against them for any attack.Not a threat? To who? Us? SK? Japan? Allies?
If NK isn't a threat, why even bother with Iran? They aren't a threat (to allies) either?
North Korea threatens nuclear strike on US - CNNPolitics
So some red flag assassinates Kim and makes it look like the CIA. They appear to be ready for a first nuclear strike. But don't worry, they won't, according to you.
I'm sure glad you're not in office.
I never said the CIA would. I said red flag. Someone else. The threats from Kim has been ongoing. I showed you one. They're all over the news for many years.Why do think that NK is a threat to Hapan? Once again, having the ability is not a "threat". By your logic all Americans should be disarmed since they are a "threat" to their neighbors. It is not even much of threat to SK because they know that their would be massive retaliation against them for any attack.
Iran is a state that has engaged in wars with its neighbors. It has a history of belligerence and stopping them from developing nukes makes sense.
And why would the CIA assassinate Kim? You need to rein in your fantasies. You should be glad that you are not in office.
OK. So you ARE in the problem area. My bad.
You sadly do not know what "proofs" are in the first place. And as usual you are projecting.I never said the CIA would. I said red flag. Someone else. The threats from Kim has been ongoing. I showed you one. They're all over the news for many years.
This is going nowhere. Just believe what you want. I get tired of seeking out and posting proofs while you just bloviate.
Whatever.You sadly do not know what "proofs" are in the first place. And as usual you are projecting.
You will never learn with that attitude.Whatever.