• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump's America -- Crimes against humanity

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Oh, but some here at RF actually "thought" that Hillary was more the warmonger between the two, ignoring what Trump repeatedly said during the campaign as well as a leak whereas he asked his military trainer for the debates that if we have nukes how come we ain't we using them? He asked not once but three times.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Oh, but some here at RF actually "thought" that Hillary was more the warmonger between the two, ignoring what Trump repeatedly said during the campaign as well as a leak whereas he asked his military trainer for the debates that if we have nukes how come we ain't we using them. He asked not once but three times.
Hillary has an actual record voting for & advocating for war.
So she did indeed pose a risk to be compared with Trump's.
(And we all know that he was at risk for hawkish behavior too.)
You cannot claim to know that she'd have been a peaceful Prez.

Hey, aren't you the one who complains when the Hillary subject is broached?
Something about her being a distraction?
 
Last edited:

Father

Devourer of Truth
oh, lets ignore Obama the king of drone strikes who in his time in office killed millions of civilians with drone strikes. but no when the white (orange) man does it than its a problem
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
oh, lets ignore Obama the king of drone strikes who in his time in office killed millions of civilians with drone strikes. but no when the white (orange) man does it than its a problem
It does not further your assertion to use stupidly high and wrong numbers.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
Hillary has an actual record voting for & advocating for war.
So she did indeed pose a risk to be compared to Trump's.
She doesn't compare. Trump still gets into Twitter wars, he was clearly a bully, he was clearly not level headed, and Hillary hadn't been named in all the lawsuits.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
She doesn't compare.

People are too polarized regarding those two.
Hillary voted for war, & advocated war.
Thus, she did pose a risk.
One reason Bernie was relatively attractive was his likely more peaceful agenda.
Even many Democrats agree with me on this.
So she did indeed pose a risk.

Who is riskier?
You'd have said Trump was.
I thought she was.
It's just a difference of opinion about the degree of risk each posed.
Trump still gets into Twitter wars, he was clearly a bully, he was clearly not level headed, and Hillary hadn't been named in all the lawsuits.
This is good evidence for your relative evaluation.
But my judgement call wa different.
 

suncowiam

Well-Known Member

People are too polarized regarding those two.
Hillary voted for war, & advocated war.
Thus, she did pose a risk.
One reason Bernie was relatively attractive was his likely more peaceful agenda.
Even many Democrats agree with me on this.
So she did indeed pose a risk.

Who is riskier?
You'd have said Trump was.
I thought she was.
It's just a difference of opinion about the degree of risk each posed.

This is good evidence for your relative evaluation.
But my judgement call wa different.

Right, they both supported wars and both lied about how much they supported wars.
 
Top