Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not familiar with that website but it seems fairly skewed.
Do you have another reference on the poll?
And yeah...I'm being lazy. Sorry!!
More FAKE NEWS from the NEW YORK ELITE!Here's the link just for you, Dave. Investor's Business Daily
I pray that it is deeply humiliating to all of them.
Not familiar with that website but it seems fairly skewed.
Do you have another reference on the poll?
And yeah...I'm being lazy. Sorry!!
32% of the IBD/TIPP poll matches the Quinnipiac poll which puts him at 33%.
What surprises me is that he had any significant support to begin with.
There is still nothing resembling an explanation for that. Mistrust of traditional politicians only carries one so far.
This site gives a weighted average of multiple polls (sources and methods in the link). Presently, it's got Trump's approval rating at 36.9.
The various polls are a bit like an assortment of bathroom scales. One may show you at 172 lbs, another at 175 lbs, and another at 176 lbs - roughly similar numbers that vary slightly and leave you wondering what you really weigh.
But if you gain or lose 5 lbs, each will generally reflect the same change in the same direction, meaning that the trending is more reliable than the absolute numbers.
What surprises me is that he had any significant support to begin with.
Politicus is a Progressive website. It's strong on opinion, but I've found their opinions are backed up by fact.
Are these the same pollsters that said Clinton was going to win the election?
I bolded what I see as the most important part of your statement and after poking around that site I would have agreed with your statement %100 if you would have stated that it's "strong on opinion but their opinions have some grain of truth in them" almost as if it is were a television play that was preceded by the disclaimer "this movie was loosely based on true events". Overall the entire site seems to fall very easily into the category of gray propaganda which is the most insidious kind, fortunately for the readers their subtlety is akin to a flying mallet.
Are these the same pollsters that said Clinton was going to win the election?