• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Trump's Conviction and the 6th Amendment.

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Let's take a look at what I was replying to......

So, who were you referring to if you weren't referring personally about me?
You have to look at the post that I was responding to. You just quote mined. You took a comment out of context.

Perhaps that could be the root of your problem and why you still support Trump. In this exchange you only took a very shallow look at what was going on and drew an incorrect conclusion that agreed with your personal prejudices. You appear to be doing the same when it involves anything to do with Trump at all.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
You have to look at the post that I was responding to. You just quote mined. You took a comment out of context.

Perhaps that could be the root of your problem and why you still support Trump. In this exchange you only took a very shallow look at what was going on and drew an incorrect conclusion that agreed with your personal prejudices. You appear to be doing the same when it involves anything to do with Trump at all.
I see the words "you" and "your" 8 times in that post.
Seems to be a pattern with YOU getting personal.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I see the words "you" and "your" 8 times in that post.
Seems to be a pattern with YOU getting personal.
Now you are making the mistake of corrections with personal attacks. That was what you actual meant when you complained about making it personal. I know that you like to mimic the people that refute you, but you need a valid point first when it comes to refutation. You reacted negatively when you made a post that required support and when you could not do so you attack those personally that refuted you.

And yes, when you make errors of the sort that you constantly make the word "you" will appear quite often in a post that corrects you.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
Now you are making the mistake of corrections with personal attacks. That was what you actual meant when you complained about making it personal. I know that you like to mimic the people that refute you, but you need a valid point first when it comes to refutation. You reacted negatively when you made a post that required support and when you could not do so you attack those personally that refuted you.

And yes, when you make errors of the sort that you constantly make the word "you" will appear quite often in a post that corrects you.
For someone who likes to :Dcorrect:D people, you sure don't like to admit your own mistakes.
But that's ok. I know your type.
 

McBell

Unbound
Whew! Not only do you project, but now you show your hypocrisy as well!
Here's some friendly advice: Put down the shovel, walk away.
13512044_520640804812236_3937076004108425623_n.jpg
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
Notice how yet again, you have nothing to say about the content of the post.

This is just a total cop-out and not a valid or useful response. Just an attempted insult. Again.
How is it insulting to give posts the credit they deserve? Would you like LESS credit for your posts? I'm not sure I can do that, but I'll try.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
Notice how yet again, you have nothing to say about the content of the post.

This is just a total cop-out and not a valid or useful response. Just an attempted insult. Again.
I was asking for clarification.
Once again, you failed to provide it. Looks like you weren't even clear on what you meant.
 
Last edited:

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I was asking for clarification.
Once again, you failed to provide it. Looks like you weren't even clear on what you meant.
No you weren't. You were just trying to insult me.

"How is it insulting to give posts the credit they deserve? Would you like LESS credit for your posts? I'm not sure I can do that, but I'll try."

The one right before that was, "I give posts the credibility they deserve."



Does anyone believe the above was written by somebody "looking for clarification" ... ?


What were you looking for clarification for, exactly? Do tell.
 

Laniakea

Not of this world
No glitter.
Glitter distracts.
And distractions are bad.
So bad, in fact, it has been attributed to the DEVIL!

yeah, devil bad is really really bad.
(please note the not one, but TWO reallys)
You ok there?
You seem to be off on a tangent that's totally unrelated to the topic.
 
Top