Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Thinking about this....I wonder if it's fear or just good judgment.Is this the same guy who wont come to the uk because he's afraid of protests?
Thinking about this....I wonder if it's fear or just good judgment.
Visiting a country with nasty protests wouldn't serve any useful
purpose for him.
It's like a flame war. Ever have someone try to provoke you with
insults, & then cry "Coward!" if you refuse to respond?
I have. The best way to end one is to ignore one.
Getting no reaction, the wind in their sails dies.
Those weren't the alternatives I saw.So he is either afraid of protesters or afraid of his own ego
Not unbelievable at all.Please say this is a joke.
Thankfully it's satire. But not unbelievable.
What double standard, man?Had I died there, you wouldn't have to endure my posts either.
But neither of us thought that cause deathworthy.
Go Dodgers!
What an odd double standard you guys have....
Trump is criticized cuz he didn't go to Viet Nam.
Hillary didn't serve either, but that's OK. And she'd
have risked little, being guaranteed to be a REMF.
Hillary is a hawk who never served in the military.What double standard, man?
The other is Hillary.
Hillary is a hawk who never served in the military.
But she isn't called a "chickenhawk".
This is a double standard, ie, applying the definition to one, but not the other.
Maybe she is a hawk as you understand the term.Hillary is a hawk who never served in the military.
But she isn't called a "chickenhawk".
This is a double standard, ie, applying the definition to one, but not the other.
Those weren't the alternatives I saw.
Not all conflicts are worth entering.
Even the New York Times, which supported her,Maybe she is a hawk as you understand the term.
Myself, I don't remember she going anywhere near the extremes of caricature that Trump routinely goes to in order to appear "strong".
So there is no double standard, at least from me.
I agree with Bernie Sanders on her record....Throughout her career she has displayed instincts
on foreign policy that are more aggressive than
those of President Obama — and most Democrats.
That's a fair argument.Hillary is a hawk who never served in the military.
But she isn't called a "chickenhawk".
This is a double standard, ie, applying the definition to one, but not the other.
That's the nicest thing anyone has said to me all month!You are most definitely not trump.
So what?Even the New York Times, which supported her,
agrees that she's a hawk.
How Hillary Clinton Became a Hawk
I agree with Bernie Sanders on her record....
Bernie Sanders' focus on Clinton's Iraq War vote isn't harping - it's necessary | Trevor Timm
Already explained.So what?
Hillary is a hawk who never served in the military.
But she isn't called a "chickenhawk".
This is a double standard, ie, applying the definition to one, but not the other.
Oh, the faithful.....how different your perspective is.Not double standards at all. I am sure Hillary would not hesitate to enter a war zone. and has done so in other roles. but not under fire.
But why pick Hillary. she is not president, nor boastful of her bravery.
Some other Presidents have been there and done that.
Trump is just frit.
If that is what you have to offer, then so be it.Already explained.
I don't expect everyone to be swayed by cogent reasoning.If that is what you have to offer, then so be it.
On a serious note the real reason we need guns is decepticons.
Please say this is a joke.
Thankfully it's satire. But not unbelievable.