Bear Wild
Well-Known Member
It was still to be taken internally whether injection or not."It wouldn’t be through injection."
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It was still to be taken internally whether injection or not."It wouldn’t be through injection."
Does not matter a president must be much more careful and knowledgeable than this one. People have actually tried his advice.He made no recommendation. He was asking if they could look into something that he considered "interesting".
No thank the Germans for that!!!!Thank God for that.
So you think a president should on national television propose even if it is a question things that could be fatal to anyone who tries them?I know that if a Democrat or celebrity had asked a similar question no one would have noticed - because there is nothing wrong with asking questions.
That the Unitied states did a better job than any other countryWhat quote by the President do you believe you are disproving here?
You cannot see this is exactly the opposite to what he does?You know full well that I claimed that the President has been attempting to keep people calm - not "whip" anyone up.
In the UK we all watched as President Trump made mention of using disinfectant internally. True.That never happened. Fake news.
I was not offended. You just misrepresented what I said.I apologize if I have offended you.
Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) makes people unreasonably hostile and irrational toward the President.Trumps record is clear to anyone. He has been divisive, has better connection with world dictators, and is sending us backwards with environmental protection as we head into a crisis.
You never offended me. You never openly insulted me. You just claimed that I had said something that I did not.Note nothing mentioned about you.
I don’t know when the President misrepresented medical information. Do you have a specific example?I disagree. He misrepresents medical information. He supports unconfirmed medical treatment, boasts about how great he is doing after calling everything a hoax.
Yet - on the other hand - you praise South Korea for their response to the crisis - and they didn’t close down their country at all.He promises everything will open on Easter despite all of the medical support team in complete saying this was not a good Idea.
The majority of the briefings were of the President’s medical team - not the President himself.The best way for a president to calm down the people is to be careful and knowledgeable about what he says. Trump is none of these.
There was no “message”.Yes it was. As a member of the medical community the message was clearly incorrect and sent a dangerous message.
What was to be taken internally?It was still to be taken internally whether injection or not.
Of course it matters.Does not matter a president must be much more careful and knowledgeable than this one. People have actually tried his advice.
I’m not about to take away credit where it is due.No thank the Germans for that!!!!
He never said that anyone should do this or to try anything on themselves.So you think a president should on national television propose even if it is a question things that could be fatal to anyone who tries them?
I'm asking you to supply the actual quote and the source of the quote.That the Unitied states did a better job than any other country
I cannot see what is not there.You cannot see this is exactly the opposite to what he does?
Except he was the one calling a hoax and he is the one spreading lies so does that make the king of grade-A morons?The President cannot be held accountable for those with TDS - grade-A morons - spreading lies and hoaxes.
I’m not disparaging the Germans - but I believe that God is due all of our gratitude.
Watch the briefings yourself.
He asked his team of medical experts about using ultraviolet light in the body and possible methods to detoxify or “clean” the body internally.
It is the media, Hollywood and the Democrats who have been “whipping people up” - not the President.
First off - the President "calling a hoax" is not the same as "starting a hoax" - so I don't know why you pointed this out.Except he was the one calling a hoax and he is the one spreading lies so does that make the king of grade-A morons?
What did they do exactly to warrant my respect?No the Germans are due the respect for what they did.
That's a discussion for another thread - but God allows everyone - follower and non-follower - to get sick and die.If god was in control of this then why wouldn't gods followers been protected.
I don't believe for a second that you watched all of them or any of them for that matter.I watch all of them that's why I posted what I did.
This is the third time I have had to point out that your own OP claims that the President spent only 1% of the time of the briefings to congratulate himself and his team.This is a dangerous divisive president and his briefings by him are often incoherent and self congratulating.
First off - it's a question - not a statement."And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost" This statement should never been made from a president with any intelligence on national news.
Again - he made no statement - he asked a question.The connection of disinfectant and injection are too closely aligned and anyone at that level of office should have been aware that this statement has no medical support.
Again - he made no statement - and the "rest" is actually watching the briefing and not relying on a news anchor or Twitter to get my "liberal spin" on what Trump had said.He was aware of the crisis long enough not to make a ignorant statement like that. The rest is just excuses and coverup
Nope.Don't you actually mean the medical field itself who has been in conflict and disagreeing what the president does?
You either watched a BBC "spin" on what he said or you suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome.In the UK we all watched as President Trump made mention of using disinfectant internally. True.
Exactly.That darned BBC..... always making stuff up, eh?
This claim contradicts the OP that claims that out of 35 briefings the President dedicated 45 minutes (1% of the time) to praising his efforts and the efforts of his team.And he spends most his time telling America that he and his team are 'tremendous', 'fantastic' (that one's true! ), amazing, 'great people', 'nice guys' and so forth.......... every press conference is not about saving and protecting people, it's all about selling...... Trump!
We've watched Trump selling Trump through those meetings.You either watched a BBC "spin" on what he said or you suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Exactly.
Like how they claimed that the President had made racist comments against those anti-American Congresswomen.
This claim contradicts the OP that claims that out of 35 briefings the President dedicated 45 minutes (1% of the time) to praising his efforts and the efforts of his team.
Did you not read the OP? Do you disagree with the OP?
And the flip-side are the DABS*.suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Like how they claimed that the President had made racist comments against those anti-American Congresswomen.
I never claimed that he wasn't "selling Trump" during the briefings.We've watched Trump selling Trump through those meetings.
If you like President Trump then you do. But most Brits have a very low opinion of his levels of care for others.
Take your pick.
I hope you are not claiming that I have this DABS - because that would be a violation of Forum Rule #1.And the flip-side are the DABS*.
* Dumb As a Brick Syndrome.
I would not consider Wikipedia to be a "non-partisan source".Maybe read this from a non-partisan source: Racial views of Donald Trump - Wikipedia
The BBC is biased.
Which is why I put the "" there, to thus indicate I was pulling your leg.I hope you are not claiming that I have this DABS - because that would be a violation of Forum Rule #1.
Sorry, but that simply is clearly a bogus cover-up attempt in all likelihood, because of the word "Derangement". Your wording above sorta tells me that really do know that.Claiming that someone has a particular bias (TDS) - however - is not.
I get this kind of nonsense back all the time with the time with some people here who are not able to counter evidence with facts, thus they blame the "messenger" (Wikipedia). Even if you thought you're correct, there are links that were provided there that you could have checked out, but you clearly didn't do that. Next time, if you can't come back with facts, maybe consider being honest with what you say, and sometimes saying nothing may be the best.I would not consider Wikipedia to be a "non-partisan source".
That largely depends largely on who's doing the reporting.The BBC is biased.
Exactly...... They see only what they want to see......